Table 5. Influence of AMPs on the proportion of different bacterial phyla.
Bacterial phylum | I | II | III | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bacteroidetes | 0 d | 36.99±1.45 | 34.35±2.82 | 36.15±3.77 |
20 d | 40.87±2.19 | 41.77±6.26 | 43.68±3.53 | |
60 d | 47.12±1.10 | 51.81±4.75 | 52.77±4.33 | |
Firmicutes | 0 d | 27.02±4.16 | 26.75±3.38 | 28.08±2.50 |
20 d | 27.19±1.77 | 30.40±4.44 | 29.65±3.32 | |
60 d | 18.05±1.07A | 22.69±0.32B | 22.70±1.70B | |
Proteobacteria | 0 d | 19.92±4.13 | 19.37±2.01 | 19.69±2.70 |
20 d | 19.23±2.88A | 9.31±1.10B | 7.73±2.46B | |
60 d | 19.99±0.17A | 8.02±3.28B | 3.29±0.46C | |
Verrucomicrobia | 0 d | 4.60±1.67 | 4.88±1.02 | 5.06±0.67 |
20 d | 4.34±0.34 | 4.85±0.19 | 4.45±0.40 | |
60 d | 2.69±0.35A | 4.17±1.51A | 7.81±2.43B | |
Fibrobacteres | 0 d | 5.25±0.63 | 5.76±0.23 | 5.30±0.62 |
20 d | 3.93±0.26A | 5.50±0.46B | 5.37±0.18B | |
60 d | 2.63±0.40A | 4.47±0.33B | 4.36±0.31B | |
Tenericutes | 0 d | 2.21±0.25 | 2.16±0.81 | 2.45±1.48 |
20 d | 1.83±0.58A | 2.05±0.54A | 3.72±0.92B | |
60 d | 2.43±0.44A | 3.41±0.76AB | 4.56±0.96B | |
Spirochaetes | 0 d | 0.95±0.15 | 0.85±0.18 | 0.69±0.29 |
20 d | 1.25±0.17A | 1.15±0.22A | 0.41±0.08B | |
60 d | 3.00±0.71A | 1.21±0.41B | 1.35±0.21B | |
Cyanobacteria | 0 d | 1.67±0.45 | 1.53±0.22 | 1.24±0.39 |
20 d | 1.13±0.19A | 2.85±0.48B | 2.48±0.20B | |
60 d | 0.60±0.11A | 2.09±0.39B | 1.45±0.35C |
A,B,CValues with different superscripts in the same row differ significantly (P<0.05); I, control group; II and III, groups treated with 2 and 3 g/per head per day of antimicrobial peptides, respectively. (The table are detailed in S1 File)