Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 26.
Published in final edited form as: Biochemistry. 2019 Feb 11;58(8):1048–1060. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.8b00943

Table 1:

Evaluation of KD and |Δωmax| values derived from 2D 1H,15N-HSQC titrations of 15N-labeled PAR1GFD, PAR1GKE, and PAR1GED bound to PPACK-Thrombina

Peptide Residue KD for PPACK-IIa (μM) |Δωmax| (ppm) IIa residues in contact with PAR1 (49–62)
PAR1GFD F55 251 NA F34, L65, 182
PAR1GFD D50 Solvent exchange issue NA R73
PAR1GKE K51 167 ± 49 0.09 ± 0.02 In vicinity of R73
PAR1GKE E60 280 NA Not seen in X-ray (might contact I82, K110)
PAR1GED E53 Too weak for KD calculation NA T74, Y76, and R75
PAR1GED D58 36 ± 6.6 0.41 ± 0.05 Not seen in X-ray (might contact R77a)
a

For these HSQC titrations, the PAR1 peptide concentrations were maintained at 50 μM while the PPACK-thrombin concentrations were diluted serially. KD values were determined from in-house scripts written in Python. Experimental data employed for these calculations included the various concentrations of protein and peptide. In addition, 15N chemical shift differences for sets of free and bound conditions were utilized for F55, E60, and D58. 1H chemical shift differences were employed for the K51. The HSQC titrations were carried out at least in duplicate. A Monte-Carlo approach that assumes a 10% error in the serially diluted protein samples was employed for error analysis.