Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 30;18:114. doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0917-y

Table 3.

Performance of adipose tissue in predicting the composite end-point

All patients C-statistics Net reclassification index
Model 1 (95% CI) Model 3 (95% CI) Model without vs. with adipose tissue
Percent (95% CI) p value
Model without adipose tissue 0.67 (0.63–0.72)
Model including
 EAT 0.53 (0.49–0.58) 0.68 (0.63–0.72) 19.6% (1.4–37.8) 0.035
 High EAT 0.54 (0.50–0.58) 0.67 (0.63–0.72) 20.8% (2.5–39.1) 0.026
Men
 Model without adipose tissue 0.65 (0.60–0.70)
 Model including
  EAT 0.54 (0.49–0.59) 0.66 (0.61–0.70) 17.7% (− 3.1 to 38.5) 0.09
  High EAT 0.55 (0.50–0.59) 0.65 (0.60–0.70) 19.6% (1.1–40.0) 0.06
Women
 Model without adipose tissue 0.66 (0.55–0.76)
 Model including
  EAT 0.50 (0.39–0.60) 0.66 (0.56–0.77) − 4.3% (− 42.8 to 34.1) 0.83
  High EAT 0.52 (0.43–0.60) 0.66 (0.55–0.77) 20.3% (20.6–61.2) 0.33

Adipose tissue variables are presented as continuous or as binary variables: high (> median) vs. low (< median) levels of adipose tissue

Model 1 is unadjusted

Model 3 is adjusted for age, sex, LDL, diabetes duration, HbA1C, systolic blood pressure, smoking and BMI

CI confidence interval, EAT epicardial adipose tissue, HR hazard ratio, PAT pericardial adipose tissue, CAT total cardiac adipose tissue