Table 2.
Studies | Randomized adequatelya | Allocation concealed | Patient blinded | Care provider blinded | Outcome assessor blinded | Acceptable drop-out rateb | ITT Analysisc | Avoided selective reporting | Similar baseline | Similar or avoided cofactor | Patient compliance | Similar timing | Qualityd |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wang et al | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | High |
Liang at al | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Moderate |
Roopa et al | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | High |
Kim et al | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | High |
Shi et al | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Unclear | High |
Ou et al | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Moderate |
a: Only if the method of sequence made was explicitly introduced could get a ‘Yes’
b: Drop-out rate < 20% could get a ‘Yes’, otherwise ‘No’
c: ITT = intention-to-treat, only if all randomized participants were analyzed in the group they were allocated to could receive a ‘Yes’
d: “Yes” items more than 7 means ‘High’; more than 4 but no more than 7 means ‘Moderate’; no more than 4 means ‘Low’