Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 31.
Published in final edited form as: J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Jan 24;23(4):760–767. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04106-2

Table 2.

Comparison of patient characteristics between those with DLM identified with image guidance assistance and those with DLM not identified with image guidance

Patients with DLM identified with image guidance (n = 5) Patients with DLM not identified with image guidance (n = 9) p value
Age (years), median (range) 61 (59–73) 52 (30–75) 0.205
Sex
 Male 2 (40%) 2 (22%) 0.480
BMI, median (range) 26.6 (19.3–31.3) 23.0 (19.9–25.6) 0.463
CRS 2 (2–3) 3(2–3) 0.101
Months of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, median (range) 7 (6–17.5) 4 (3–16) 0.050
Chemotherapy regimen
 Included 5-FU 5 (100%) 9 (100%) -
 Included oxaliplatin 5 (100%) 8 (89%) 0.439
 Included irinotecan 2 (40%) 1 (11%) 0.207
 Included hepatic arterial infusion pump 2 (40%) 1 (11%) 0.207
DLMs per patient, median (range) 3 (2–4) 3 (1–8) 0.784
Months between preoperative imaging showing DLM and DOS, median (range) 7.1 (2.6–18.7) 5.6 (4.5–12.4) 0.386

DLM disappearing liver metastases, BMI body mass index, CRS colorectal risk score, 5-FU 5-fluorouracil, DOS date of surgery