Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 28;7:e7577. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7577

Table 2. Assessment of how well supported each behavioural hypothesis is by the results of the present study.

As hypotheses have not been previously described in an explicitly quantitative manner, they are codified here in a qualitative fashion only.

Hypothesis Whole-limb posture Digit posture Force required at claw tip Supported?
Slash-kicking prey (Fig. 1B) Extended Extended High No
Prey riding (Fig. 1C) Extended to semi-flexed Moderately extended High No
Prey-mounted flank attack (Fig. 1D) Extended to semi-flexed Moderately extended High No
Targeting prey’s vital areas (Fig. 1E) Semi-flexed to flexed Variable Variable (depending on substrate) Partly
Prey restraint (Fig. 1F) Flexed Flexed Low Yes
Kicking defence (Fig. 1G) Extended Extended High No
Digging out prey (Fig. 1H) Extended to semi-flexed Flexed Variable (depending on substrate) Partly