Table 4.

Mean of Collaboration Measures by CS and BH Collaboration Groups

	Collaboration groups based on low (0–0.36) and high (0.37+)
	Total	CS Low/ BH Low	CS High/ BH Low	CS Low/ BH High	CS High/ BH High	F	p	f-index	eta-sq.
Unweighted n	185	33	40	28	84
Weighted n	3202	1229	666	536	771
Weighted %	100%	38%	21%	17%	24%
Weight Adjusted n	185	71	38	31	45
CS to BH Referral assertiveness (% of 14 items)	63%	53%	76%	60%	72%	19.08	0.000	0.57	0.25
CS Information received from BH (% of 8 items)	49%	53%	48%	23%	65%	7.71	0.000	0.36	0.12
CS Quality of direct BH services (% of 24 items)	11%	9%	13%	11%	14%	1.40	0.246	0.15	0.02
BH Information sent to CS (% of 8 items)	52%	45%	54%	52%	64%	2.33	0.076	0.20	0.04
BH Quality of direct BH services (% of 24 items)	60%	59%	58%	64%	63%	1.01	0.389	0.13	0.02
Average across above	47%	44%	50%	42%	55%

The 4 groups explain 39% of the variance in the joint distribution of these measures of collaboration (1-Wilk’s lambda)

Effect size f-index: small = 0.10, moderate = 0.25 and large = 0.40

CS = community supervision; BH = behavioral health

Bold indicates p < .001, f-index > 0.10, eta-sq > .01