Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 28;12:1527–1541. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S202193

Table 2.

Age-standardized sex-specific prevalence of T1DM among those with newly diagnosed diabetes

Age, y Male Female LADA Classic T1DM T1DM
Male Female Male Female Male Female
n n n(%) n(%) n(%) n(%) n(%) n(%)
30–34 885 298 38(4.29) 20(6.71) 56(6.33) 28(9.40) 94(10.62) 48(16.11)
35–39 1106 394 46(4.16) 28(7.11) 39(3.53) 23(5.84) 85(7.69) 51(12.94)
40–44 1429 576 70(4.90) 23(3.99) 23(1.61) 18(3.13) 93(6.51) 41(7.12)
45–49 1607 955 57(3.55) 46(4.82) 32(1.99) 15(1.57) 89(5.54) 61(6.39)
50–54 1705 1442 53(3.11) 53(3.68) 27(1.58) 22(1.53) 80(4.69) 75(5.20)
55–59 1227 1076 31(2.53) 41(3.81) 20(1.63) 14(1.30) 51(4.16) 55(5.11)
60–64 1052 1055 33(3.14) 35(3.32) 6(0.57) 11(1.04) 39(3.71) 46(4.36)
65–69 675 657 20(2.96) 19(2.89) 9(1.33) 4(0.61) 29(4.30) 23(3.50)
≥70 656 554 20(3.05) 25(4.51) 3(0.46) 6(1.08) 23(3.51) 31(5.60)
p for trend 0.0020 0.0019 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
Crude rate 10,342 7007 368(3.56) 290(4.14) 215(2.08) 141(2.01) 583(5.64) 431(6.15)
Standardized 3.40(2.75–4.05) 4.20(3.47–4.93) 1.72(1.25–2.19) 1.96(1.45–2.47) 5.14(4.36–5.92) 6.16(5.30–7.02)
p for sex difference 0.0039 0.0520 0.0004

Notes: Data are expressed as n (%). Standardized prevalence was expressed as p (95% CI). p for trend was derived from the Mantel-Haenszel Chi-square test and p for sex difference was derived from logistic regression; The prevalence was standardized to the patient population with newly diagnosed diabetes in China National Survey of Diabetes in 2010 and only those aged 30 years and above were included in the standardization, so the standardized prevalence was only for those aged 30 years and above.

Abbreviations: LADA, latent autoimmune diabetes in adults and including latent autoimmune diabetes in youth; T1DM, type 1 diabetes, including LADA and classic type 1 diabetes.