Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 5;2014(2):CD001908. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001908.pub3
Methods Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group study. Three treatment arms: one PLC, two TGB. Participants randomly assigned using ratio 1:1:1 in blocks of six Treatment periods = 12 weeks
Participants Multi‐centre US study (26 centres) 318 participants (178 male) aged 12 to 71 years with drug‐resistant partial epilepsy were randomly assigned 107 to PCB, 106 to TGB 16 mg BID, 105 to TGB 8 mg QID Valproate allowed in combination with an enzyme‐inducing drug but not as monotherapy Median baseline four‐weekly complex partial seizures; frequency during baseline was as follows: PCB = 8.4; TGB 16 mg BID = 8.4; TGB 8 mg QID = 7.9
Interventions Add‐on placebo, TGB 16 mg BID or TGB 8 mg QID
Outcomes
  1. 50% responder rates

  2. Treatment withdrawal

  3. Adverse effects

Notes From the 318 people randomly assigned to the double‐blind phase, four were excluded from the intention‐to‐treat analyses. All 318 people were evaluated for adverse events. 47 people withdrew from the study: 10 receiving PLC; 16 receiving TGB 16 mg BID; 21 receiving TGB 8 mg QID
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Used ratio of 1:1:1 in blocks of six per study centre
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Used sequentially allocated sealed packages
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes Low risk Used identical packaging and medication
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk Attrition rates reported and intention‐to‐treat analysis employed
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All outcomes reported in methods section were reported in text; however no protocol was available for comparison of outcomes