Study | Reason for exclusion |
---|---|
ACS/NIH 1976 | Study design: not prospective: registry report |
Ahn 2003 | Allocation: not consistent with 'Mendelian randomization': age unequally distributed HSCT versus IST: 83 versus 61 patients in age category 14 to 40 years, 73 versus 3 patients in age category >= 41 years, P < 0.001 |
Arranz 1994 | Allocation: not consistent with 'Mendelian randomization': assignment by age, cut‐off 40 years |
Bacigalupo 1988 | Study design: not prospective: registry report |
Bacigalupo 1996 | Study design: not prospective: registry report |
Bacigalupo 2000a | Study design: not prospective: registry report |
Bacigalupo 2000b | Study design: not prospective: registry report |
Camitta 1976 | Control: fewer than 80% of patients with first‐line IST |
Camitta 1978 | Control: fewer than 80% of patients with first‐line IST |
Camitta 1979 | Control: fewer than 80% of patients with first‐line IST |
Cesaro 2010 | Study design: not prospective: registry report |
Champlin 1984 | Allocation: not consistent with 'Mendelian randomization': assignment by age, cut‐off 45 years |
Chen 1992 | Fewer than 5 patients in one arm: 3 patients in MSD‐HSCT group |
Crump 1992 | Intervention: fewer than 80% of patients with first‐line MSD‐HSCT: 100% second‐line HSCT |
de Planque 1990 | Intervention: fewer than 80% of patients with first‐line MSD‐HSCT: 42% second‐line HSCT |
Deyell 2009 | Study design: not prospective |
Doney 1981 | Intervention: fewer than 80% of patients with first‐line HSCT: haploidentical marrow |
Doney 1997 | Allocation: not consistent with 'Mendelian randomization': assignment by age, cut‐off 55 years |
Fouladi 2000 | Study design: not prospective, no clues to prospective design |
Ganapiev 2010 | Study design: not prospective, no clues to prospective design [Russian] |
Garanito 2009 | Study design: not prospective |
George 2010 | Study design: not prospective |
Ghavamzadeh 2004 | Allocation: not consistent with 'Mendelian randomization': assignment by age, cut‐off 45 years |
Gillio 1997 | Study design: not prospective, reporting of retrospective design |
Gluckman 1979 | Study design: not prospective, no clues to prospective design; a randomized allocation was reported for the last year of investigation, however, the number of patients randomized and the years of transplantation were not reported |
Gluckman 1981 | Study design: not prospective: registry report |
Gluckman 1987 | Study design: not prospective: registry report |
Golubovskaya 2010 | Unclear information: conference abstract without required information, authors did not clearly report whether allocation was based on availability of MSD and not on patient age |
Halperin 1989 | Study design: not prospective, no clues to prospective design |
Hirabayashi 1995 | Study design: not prospective: registry report |
Horowitz 1989 | Study design: not prospective: registry report |
Horowitz 1997 | Study design: not prospective: registry report |
Howard 2004 | Outcome: not a predefined outcome |
Höcker 1987 | Allocation: not consistent with 'Mendelian randomization': by age [German] |
Ilhan 2001 | Patients: fewer than 80% of patients with SAA |
Kahn 2002 | Allocation: not consistent with 'Mendelian randomization': assignment by age, cut‐off 40 years |
Kim 1994 | Allocation: not consistent with 'Mendelian randomization' |
Kim 2003 | Allocation: not consistent with 'Mendelian randomization': assignment by age, cut‐off 50 years |
Kodera 1999 | Study design: not prospective: registry report |
Kojima 1988 | Study design: not prospective, no clues to prospective design |
Kojima 2000 | Study design: not prospective, reporting of retrospective design |
Kosaka 2004 | Intervention: fewer than 80% of patients with first‐line MSD‐HSCT: 100% second‐line |
Kulagin 2006 | Fewer than 5 patients in one arm |
Lawlor 1997 | Study design: not prospective, reporting of retrospective design |
Ljungman 1991 | Study design: not prospective, no clues to prospective design [Swedish] |
Locasciulli 1990 | Study design: not prospective: registry report |
Locasciulli 2007 | Study design: not prospective: registry report |
McCann 1994 | Study design: not prospective: registry report |
Milosevic 1998 | Intervention: fewer than 80% of patients with first‐line MSD‐HSCT [Serbian] |
Mollee 2001 | Allocation: not consistent with 'Mendelian randomization': by age |
Montante 2009 | Fewer than 5 patients in one arm |
Mrsic 2009 | Allocation: not consistent with 'Mendelian randomization' [Croatian] |
Nagler 2001 | Patients: fewer than 80% of patients with SAA |
Paquette 1995 | Allocation: not consistent with 'Mendelian randomization': age unequally distributed HSCT versus IST, 36% versus 15% in age category 16 to 19 years, 42% versus 40% in age category 19 to 29 years, 22% versus 45% in age category >= 30 years, P = 0.02 |
Pitcher 1999 | Patients: not at least 80% SAA: 23% of patients with non‐severe aplastic anemia |
Podesta 1998 | Outcome: not a predefined outcome |
Pokorski 1998 | Study design: not prospective: registry report |
Shaw 1999 | Patients: fewer than 80% of patients with SAA |
Socié 1993 | Patients: fewer than 80% of patients with SAA |
Sovinz 2010 | Unclear information: conference abstract without required information, authors did not clearly report whether allocation was based on availability of MSD and not on patient age |
Stalder 2009 | Study design: not prospective |
Starý 1998 | Study design: not prospective [Czech] |
Tichelli 1994 | Allocation: not consistent with 'Mendelian randomization': by age |
Tschiedel 2010 | Fewer than 5 patients in one arm [German] |
Tsukimoto 1989 | Outcome: not a predefined outcome |
Tukic 2009 | Unclear information: conference abstract without required information, authors did not clearly report whether allocation was based on availability of MSD and not on patient age |
Tzeng 1989 | Study design: not prospective, no clues to prospective design |
UCLA 1976 | Control: fewer than 80% of patients with first‐line IST: androgens only |
Uss 1999 | Study design: not prospective [Russian] |
Viollier 2005 | Allocation: not consistent with 'Mendelian randomization': assignment by age, cut‐off 40 years |
Wagner 1996 | Patients: fewer than 80% of patients with SAA |
Webb 1991 | Study design: not prospective, reporting of retrospective design |
Werner 1989 | Study design: not prospective, reporting of retrospective design |
Windass 1987 | Patients: fewer than 80% of patients with SAA |
Yan 2011 | Intervention: fewer than 80% of patients with first‐line MSD‐HSCT [Chinese] |
Yoshida 2011 | Allocation: not consistent with 'Mendelian randomization': donors were family members and not siblings |
HSCT: hematopoietic stem cell transplantation IST: immunosuppressive therapy MSD: matched sibling donor MSD‐HSCT: first‐line allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from HLA‐matched (identical) sibling donor SAA: severe aplastic anemia