Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 23;2013(7):CD006407. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006407.pub2
Study Reason for exclusion
ACS/NIH 1976 Study design: not prospective: registry report
Ahn 2003 Allocation: not consistent with 'Mendelian randomization': age unequally distributed
 HSCT versus IST: 83 versus 61 patients in age category 14 to 40 years, 73 versus 3 patients in age category >= 41 years, P < 0.001
Arranz 1994 Allocation: not consistent with 'Mendelian randomization': assignment by age, cut‐off 40 years
Bacigalupo 1988 Study design: not prospective: registry report
Bacigalupo 1996 Study design: not prospective: registry report
Bacigalupo 2000a Study design: not prospective: registry report
Bacigalupo 2000b Study design: not prospective: registry report
Camitta 1976 Control: fewer than 80% of patients with first‐line IST
Camitta 1978 Control: fewer than 80% of patients with first‐line IST
Camitta 1979 Control: fewer than 80% of patients with first‐line IST
Cesaro 2010 Study design: not prospective: registry report
Champlin 1984 Allocation: not consistent with 'Mendelian randomization': assignment by age, cut‐off 45 years
Chen 1992 Fewer than 5 patients in one arm: 3 patients in MSD‐HSCT group
Crump 1992 Intervention: fewer than 80% of patients with first‐line MSD‐HSCT: 100% second‐line HSCT
de Planque 1990 Intervention: fewer than 80% of patients with first‐line MSD‐HSCT: 42% second‐line HSCT
Deyell 2009 Study design: not prospective
Doney 1981 Intervention: fewer than 80% of patients with first‐line HSCT: haploidentical marrow
Doney 1997 Allocation: not consistent with 'Mendelian randomization': assignment by age, cut‐off 55 years
Fouladi 2000 Study design: not prospective, no clues to prospective design
Ganapiev 2010 Study design: not prospective, no clues to prospective design [Russian]
Garanito 2009 Study design: not prospective
George 2010 Study design: not prospective
Ghavamzadeh 2004 Allocation: not consistent with 'Mendelian randomization': assignment by age, cut‐off 45 years
Gillio 1997 Study design: not prospective, reporting of retrospective design
Gluckman 1979 Study design: not prospective, no clues to prospective design; a randomized allocation was reported for the last year of investigation, however, the number of patients randomized and the years of transplantation were not reported
Gluckman 1981 Study design: not prospective: registry report
Gluckman 1987 Study design: not prospective: registry report
Golubovskaya 2010 Unclear information: conference abstract without required information, authors did not clearly report whether allocation was based on availability of MSD and not on patient age
Halperin 1989 Study design: not prospective, no clues to prospective design
Hirabayashi 1995 Study design: not prospective: registry report
Horowitz 1989 Study design: not prospective: registry report
Horowitz 1997 Study design: not prospective: registry report
Howard 2004 Outcome: not a predefined outcome
Höcker 1987 Allocation: not consistent with 'Mendelian randomization': by age [German]
Ilhan 2001 Patients: fewer than 80% of patients with SAA
Kahn 2002 Allocation: not consistent with 'Mendelian randomization': assignment by age, cut‐off 40 years
Kim 1994 Allocation: not consistent with 'Mendelian randomization'
Kim 2003 Allocation: not consistent with 'Mendelian randomization': assignment by age, cut‐off 50 years
Kodera 1999 Study design: not prospective: registry report
Kojima 1988 Study design: not prospective, no clues to prospective design
Kojima 2000 Study design: not prospective, reporting of retrospective design
Kosaka 2004 Intervention: fewer than 80% of patients with first‐line MSD‐HSCT: 100% second‐line
Kulagin 2006 Fewer than 5 patients in one arm
Lawlor 1997 Study design: not prospective, reporting of retrospective design
Ljungman 1991 Study design: not prospective, no clues to prospective design [Swedish]
Locasciulli 1990 Study design: not prospective: registry report
Locasciulli 2007 Study design: not prospective: registry report
McCann 1994 Study design: not prospective: registry report
Milosevic 1998 Intervention: fewer than 80% of patients with first‐line MSD‐HSCT [Serbian]
Mollee 2001 Allocation: not consistent with 'Mendelian randomization': by age
Montante 2009 Fewer than 5 patients in one arm
Mrsic 2009 Allocation: not consistent with 'Mendelian randomization' [Croatian]
Nagler 2001 Patients: fewer than 80% of patients with SAA
Paquette 1995 Allocation: not consistent with 'Mendelian randomization': age unequally distributed
 HSCT versus IST, 36% versus 15% in age category 16 to 19 years, 42% versus 40% in age category 19 to 29 years, 22% versus 45% in age category >= 30 years, P = 0.02
Pitcher 1999 Patients: not at least 80% SAA: 23% of patients with non‐severe aplastic anemia
Podesta 1998 Outcome: not a predefined outcome
Pokorski 1998 Study design: not prospective: registry report
Shaw 1999 Patients: fewer than 80% of patients with SAA
Socié 1993 Patients: fewer than 80% of patients with SAA
Sovinz 2010 Unclear information: conference abstract without required information, authors did not clearly report whether allocation was based on availability of MSD and not on patient age
Stalder 2009 Study design: not prospective
Starý 1998 Study design: not prospective [Czech]
Tichelli 1994 Allocation: not consistent with 'Mendelian randomization': by age
Tschiedel 2010 Fewer than 5 patients in one arm [German]
Tsukimoto 1989 Outcome: not a predefined outcome
Tukic 2009 Unclear information: conference abstract without required information, authors did not clearly report whether allocation was based on availability of MSD and not on patient age
Tzeng 1989 Study design: not prospective, no clues to prospective design
UCLA 1976 Control: fewer than 80% of patients with first‐line IST: androgens only
Uss 1999 Study design: not prospective [Russian]
Viollier 2005 Allocation: not consistent with 'Mendelian randomization': assignment by age, cut‐off 40 years
Wagner 1996 Patients: fewer than 80% of patients with SAA
Webb 1991 Study design: not prospective, reporting of retrospective design
Werner 1989 Study design: not prospective, reporting of retrospective design
Windass 1987 Patients: fewer than 80% of patients with SAA
Yan 2011 Intervention: fewer than 80% of patients with first‐line MSD‐HSCT [Chinese]
Yoshida 2011 Allocation: not consistent with 'Mendelian randomization': donors were family members and not siblings

HSCT: hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
 IST: immunosuppressive therapy
 MSD: matched sibling donor
 MSD‐HSCT: first‐line allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from HLA‐matched (identical) sibling donor
 SAA: severe aplastic anemia