Boccardo.
Methods | Randomised controlled trial Multi‐centre, international, open‐label Central randomisation by random numbers tables Accrual April 1997 to January 2004 Baseline patient and tumour characteristics well balanced excluding tumour size | |
Participants | Female, premenopausal and postmenopausal
Aged 18 to 70 years. Median age not reported
Operable, unilateral breast cancer, completely resected with clear surgical margins
Axillary node positive: 100% (3 or more lymph nodes)
Exclusion of metastatic disease HR positive: ER positive: 89% to 90% in each treatment arm |
|
Interventions | ARM 1 (E‐CMF)
E × 4 21‐day cycles (epirubicin 100 mg/m²) followed by CMF × 4 28‐day cycles (cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m², methotrexate 40 mg/m², fluorouracil 600 mg/m²) ARM 2 (Paclitaxel‐EV) Paclitaxel × 4 21‐day cycles (paclitaxel 175 mg/m²) followed by EV × 4 21‐day cycles (epirubicin 75 mg/m², vinorelbine 25 mg/m²) Tamoxifen 20 mg/d for 5 years given to all patients who were ER and/or PR positive Radiotherapy given as mandatory following breast‐conserving surgery, and used after mastectomy according to local guidelines |
|
Outcomes | Primary endpoint:
Secondary endpoints:
|
|
Notes | Median follow‐up: 102 months No trial record identified Funding: National Research Council and University of Research Italian Minister In the review update, O‐E and V for OS and DFS derived using Method 3 (Tierney 2007) | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "randomization... was based on random number tables" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Central allocation Quote: "randomization was carried out by telephone from a central office of the coordinating center" |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Open‐label |
Blinding of outcome assessment ‐ OS (detection bias) | Low risk | Assessment of overall survival unlikely to be influenced by no or incomplete blinding |
Blinding of outcome assessment ‐ DFS & Toxicity (detection bias) | Unclear risk | Clinical examinations every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for years 3 to 5, and annually thereafter. Chest X‐ray, liver ultrasound, and/or CT abdomen and a bone scan repeated annually during first 5 years of follow‐up. CBC and biochemistry repeated before each chemotherapy cycle. Toxicity scored using WHO criteria Comment: no involvement of an independent adjudication committee for outcome assessment |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | All 244 patients randomised accounted for in results (122 per treatment arm) |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All outcomes reported in the methods section included in the results section of the trial publication. No trial registry record or protocol found |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Quote: "treatment arms were well balanced with respect to major pretreatment variables, excluding tumour size (more patients in the E‐CMF arm were affected by tumours < 2 cm in size, P = 0.01)" |