ELDA.
Methods | Randomised controlled trial Multi‐centre, international Central randomisation, using a minimisation procedure with centre, pT and pN category, planned number of chemotherapy cycles, age as strata Open‐label study Accrual July 2003 to April 2011 Baseline tumour characteristics well balanced although slight imbalance in distribution of comorbidities (e.g. no comorbidity in 7% and 13%, and previous cerebrovascular disease in 1% and 6% in docetaxel and CMF groups, respectively) | |
Participants | Female, postmenopausal Aged 65 to 79 years (median 70) Operable breast cancer with clear surgical margins Axillary node positive or high risk node negative ECOG performance status ≤ 2 HR positive: ER positive/PgR positive: 74% to 76% in each treatment group Exclusion of metastatic disease | |
Interventions | ARM 1 (CMF)
CMF × 4 to 6 28‐day cycles (cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m², methotrexate 40 mg/m², fluorouracil 600 mg/m² on days 1 and 8) ARM 2 (Doc) Doc × 4 to 6 28‐day cycles (docetaxel 35 mg/m² on days 1, 8, and 15) 6 cycles planned for tumours < 10% positive for both ER and PgR, 4 cycles for those with ER or PR ≥ 10% Tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors according to standard schedules given after chemotherapy to patients with tumour positive for ER/PR in at least 1% of cells Patients with HER2‐positive tumour given adjuvant trastuzumab for 1 year after chemotherapy. Radiotherapy performed when indicated after the end of chemotherapy and within 6 months after surgery |
|
Outcomes | Primary endpoint:
Secondary endpoints:
|
|
Notes | Median follow‐up 70 months (95% confidence interval 66 to 73 months)
Clinical Trial Identifier: NCT00331097 (see clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00331097) Sponsored by the Clinical Trials Unit of the National Cancer Institute of Naples |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: “randomization was carried out centrally at the Clinical Trials Unit of the NCI Naples, with a computer‐based minimization procedure…” |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Central randomisation Quote: “…clinicians contacted the Clinical Trials Unit by telephone or by fax” |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Open‐label study |
Blinding of outcome assessment ‐ OS (detection bias) | Low risk | Assessment of overall survival unlikely to be influenced by no or incomplete blinding |
Blinding of outcome assessment ‐ DFS & Toxicity (detection bias) | Unclear risk | Assessment including clinical visits with biochemistry and haematological tests every 3 months for 3 years, then every 6 months for 2 years, then annually for 5 years. Chest X‐ray, ultrasonography, and mammography included. Treatment toxicity graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria Comment: no involvement of an independent adjudication committee for outcome assessment |
Blinding of outcome assessment ‐ QoL (detection bias) | High risk | Patients completing EORTC QLQ‐C30a and BR23 at baseline, and at end of first, second, and third cycles of chemotherapy |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | 302 patients randomised (docetaxel: 150; CMF: 152) and 299 patients included in modified intention‐to‐treatment analysis (99.1%) |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Methods consistent with trial registry record (clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00033683). Outcomes reported in the methods and results sections of the trial publication consistent. Primary and secondary outcomes not listed at the time of registration |
Other bias | Low risk | No other sources identified |