ICE II‐GBG 52.
Methods | Randomised controlled trial Multi‐centre (63 sites), Germany (part of German Breast Group), open‐label Randomisation performed centrally and stratified by participating centre, risk assessment method (pT3/4, pN2/3, or clinicopathological, or high urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) or high plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI‐1)), age, oestrogen receptor/progesterone receptor/HER2 status Accrual April 2009 to April 2013 Baseline characteristics balanced between treatment groups | |
Participants | Female or male patients aged ≥ 65 years with Charlson co‐morbidity index ≤ 2 Median age 72 (range 65 to 84) Two‐thirds of patients had clinopathologically medium‐ to high‐risk pT1/2 pN0/1 breast cancer 65.5% hormone receptor‐positive/HER2‐negative disease; 16.9% HER2‐positive disease; 17.6% triple‐negative breast cancer Exclusion of metastatic disease Prior chemotherapy for any malignancy and concurrent or previous systemic investigational or established anti‐tumour treatment not permitted | |
Interventions | ARM 1 (EC or CMF)
EC × 4 21‐day cycles (epirubicin 90 mg/m², cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m²) or CMF × 6 28‐day cycles (cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m², methotrexate 40 mg/m², 5‐fluorouracil 600 mg/m² on days 1 and 8) based on investigators’ decision ARM 2 (nPX) nPX × 6 21‐day cycles (nab‐paclitaxel 100 mg/m² on days 1, 8, and 15 every 3 weeks with a week of rest every 6 weeks) plus capecitabine (1000 mg/m²) twice daily on days 1 to 14 every 3 weeks Sequential radiotherapy, anti‐HER2 therapy, and endocrine treatment recommended as per national guidelines Primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor not recommended |
|
Outcomes | Primary endpoint:
Secondary endpoints:
Toxicity, assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3.0) |
|
Notes | Median follow‐up: 22.8 months Clinical Trial Identifier: NCT01204437 (see clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01204437) Funded: supported received from Celgene and Roche; sponsored/collaborators were the German Breast Group | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: “…randomization at a 1:1 ratio was performed centrally and stratified according to participating center, risk assessment method, age, and estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor/HER2 status…” |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Randomisation performed centrally |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Open‐label study |
Blinding of outcome assessment ‐ OS (detection bias) | Low risk | Assessment of overall survival unlikely to be influenced by no or incomplete blinding |
Blinding of outcome assessment ‐ DFS & Toxicity (detection bias) | Unclear risk | Assessment including clinical visits and breast imaging techniques every 3 months for 2 years, then every 6 months from year 2 to 5 for the diagnosis of local, locoregional, ipsilateral, or contralateral recurrence; distant metastasis, or death. Toxicity graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria Comment: no involvement of an independent adjudication committee for outcome assessment |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | All efficacy analysis intention‐to‐treat; safety analysis including patients who received treatment |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Trial registry record outcomes reported in the trial publication |
Other bias | Low risk | No other sources identified |