Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 29;13:1657–1663. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S202895

Table 1.

Descriptive measures for postoperative spherical equivalent, postoperative visual acuities and mesopic pupillometry in Groups A and B

Mean ± SD (Min-max) P-value
Measurement Group A (n=28) Group B (n=26)
UDVA −0.00±0.05 0.09±0.10 <0.001*
UIVA 0.20±0.04 0.39±0.09 <0.001*
UNVA 0.16±0.08 −0.01±0.09 <0.001*
SE −0.09±0.23 0.07±0.21 0.02*
CDVA −0.02±0.05 0.06±0.12 0.001*
AL 23.43±0.94 23.06±0.89 0.13
Pupilometry (mesopic) 4.56±0.87 4.60±1.04 0.94

Notes: *=Kruskal–Wallis. Group A represents the EDOF group and Group B represents the Trifocal group. Postoperative UDVA was better in Group A (0.00±0.05 vs 0.09±0.10 logMAR, P<0.001). CDVA was better in Group A (−0.02±0.05 vs 0.06±0.12, P=0.001). UIVA and UNVA had statistical significance as well. Group A performed better for UIVA: 0.20±0.04 vs 0.39±0.09, P<0.001 and Group B performed better for UNVA: 0.16±0.08 vs −0.01±0.09, P<0.001, respectively. The postoperative data of spherical equivalent (SE) comparison also had statistical significance; nevertheless, axial length (AL) and pupil diameter (PD) had no statistical significance.

Abbreviations: SE, postoperative spherical equivalent; UDVA, postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity; UIVA, postoperative uncorrected intermediate visual acuity; UNVA, postoperative uncorrected near visual acuity; CDVA, postoperative corrected distance visual acuity; AL, axial lens.