Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 2;2019(9):CD011462. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011462.pub2

Norkus 2009.

Methods Parallel RCT
Setting: tertiary cancer center Lithuania
Dates: 2004 to not reported
Follow‐up: minimum 12 months
Randomization ratio: 1:1
CCT
Participants 91 men
Inclusion criteria: men with localized prostate cancer (T1–3A), low‐to‐intermediate risk with risk of seminal vesicle or pelvic lymph node (or both) involvement of < 15% (Partin's nomograms and Roach formula).
Exclusion criteria: neoadjuvant AD therapy or surgical castration prior to surgery
Diagnostic criteria: not stated
Interventions Number of study centers: 1
Run‐in period: not stated
Extension period: no
Experimental arm: 47/47 participants
Conventional arm: 44/44 participants
Complex interventions:
Experimental arm: 57 Gy in 17 fractions over 3.5 weeks +4 fractions of 4.5 Gy
Conventional arm: 74 Gy in 37 fractions over 7.5 weeks (see Table 8)
Outcomes Primary outcome
  • OS


Secondary outcomes
  • FFBR

  • Biochemical response to treatment

  • Acute and late GI/GU toxicity


Assessed weekly for 12 weeks from start of treatment for acute toxicity, with PSA tested every 3 months during the first year, then every 6 months thereafter.
Complete outcome measures reported: yes (FFBR reported at 12 months' follow‐up)/no other outcomes reported
Funding sources Not stated
Declarations of interest Not stated
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote from publication: "The protocol was designed to randomize patients … ", page 470. Material and methods, paragraph 1.
Comment: this domain deemed at unclear risk of bias because no details provided.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No details provided with respect to allocation concealment, therefore, this domain deemed at unclear risk of bias.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 Subjective outcomes Unclear risk Not mentioned, probably not done. We deemed this domain at unclear risk of bias
  • PC‐SS: not reported

  • Late EORTC/RTOG GI RT toxicity: not reported

  • Late EORTC/RTOG GU RT toxicity: not reported

  • M‐FS: not reported

  • BR‐FS: not reported in usable form

  • Acute EORTC/RTOG GI RT toxicity: not reported

  • Acute EORTC/RTOG GU RT toxicity: not reported

  • Health‐related quality of life: not reported

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 Objective outcomes Low risk Not mentioned, probably not done. We deemed this domain at unclear risk of bias.
  • OS: low risk of bias

  • Second malignancy: not reported

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 Subjective outcomes Unclear risk Quote from publication: "Patients were evaluated weekly for 12 weeks starting from the beginning of irradiation. PSA tests were performed every 3 months during the first year after irradiation and every 6 months later. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the patient age, disease stage", page 470. Materials and methods, paragraph 4.
Comment: although there was no mention of blinding, the prespecified protocol for PSA testing would mean this domain was at low risk of bias.
PC‐SS was deemed at low risk of bias (not a compound endpoint) (see Table 2).
No details given with respect to blinding of outcome assessors for the subjective outcomes of acute and late toxicity. No details given about the method used to score toxicity. We deemed the following outcomes at unclear risk of bias.
  • PC‐SS: not reported

  • Late EORTC/RTOG GI RT toxicity: not reported

  • Late EORTC/RTOG GU RT toxicity: not reported

  • M‐FS: not reported

  • BR‐FS: not reported in usable form

  • Acute EORTC/RTOG GI RT toxicity: not reported

  • Acute EORTC/RTOG GU RT toxicity: not reported

  • Health‐related quality of life: not reported

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 Objective outcomes Low risk Blinding not mentioned, deemed at low risk of bias
  • OS: low risk of bias

  • Second malignancy: not reported

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Unclear risk There was no information provided about attrition, and it was unclear if this was an interim report for an ongoing study, or the included 91 men represented the entire cohort. We deemed this domain at unclear risk of bias.
Number of participants reported on by outcome
PC‐SS: not reported in usable form
Late EORTC/RTOG GI RT toxicity: not reported in usable form
Late EORTC/RTOG GU RT toxicity: not reported in usable form
OS: reported in 91/91 participants
DM‐FS: not reported in usable form
BR‐FS: not reported in usable form
Acute EORTC/RTOG GI RT toxicity: not reported in usable form
Acute EORTC/RTOG GU RT toxicity: not reported in usable form
Second malignancy: not reported
Quality of life: not reported in usable form
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Quote from publication: "preliminary report", page 469. Abstract
The outcomes detained in the paper comprise: OS, FFBR, PSA response, acute and late toxicity.
Outcomes reported (at 12 months' follow‐up): deaths, biochemical relapse.
Comment: as this is a preliminary report, we deemed this domain at unclear risk of bias.
Other bias Low risk We found no evidence of other sources of bias.