Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 13;8(11):5047–5057. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2374

Table 3.

Comparison of efficacy between intravenous regimes that incorporate MTX and vinca alkaloids for DF, that is recurrent/ progressive/ advanced/ or not amenable to surgery/radiation, by treatment duration

Study Number (n) Age(yr) Treatment Duration of treatment (median) Prior treatment number (%) Overall response rate (%)(CR + PR) Clinical benefit (%)(CR + PR+SD)
S R M C
Garbay et al11 62 30 Variable regimens
MTX/VBL
27 (43.5)
18 wk 33 (53) 8(13) 37(54.7) 21(MTX/VBL‐ 15) 80.6
Skapek et al12 26 10 MTX/VBL 40 wk —— 19.2 69.2
Li et al13 71 14 MTX/VNL 12 mo —— 35.2 87.3
Azzarelli et al14 30 27 MTX/VBL 12 mo 24 (80) 5(17) 4(13) 3(10) 40 100
Palassini et al8 75 36.6 Variable Regimens MTX/VNL43 (57.3) 14 mo 54(72) 8(10) 36(48) 48 (MTX/VNL‐ 51.2) 98.7
Park et al1 22 32 MTX/VBL 12 mo 14(64) 4(18) 2(9) 52 95
Ingley et al 48 33 MTX/VNL 19 mo 9(19) 1(2) 23(48) 1(2) 81 98

Abbreviations: n = Number of patients evaluated for response. Age‐ median age of diagnosis/ onset, in years.

Treatment: MTX, methotrexate; VNL, vinorelbine; VBL, vinblastine; n(%) of patients reported who were administered MTX/ vinca alkaloid.

Duration of treatment: when median duration of treatment was not provided, anticipated treatment course was documented; wk, weeks; mo, months.

Prior treatment: S, surgery; R, radiation; M, at least one or more medical treatments‐ NSAIDs, antiestrogens, tyrosine kinase inhibitors; C, chemotherapy.