Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 25;8(11):5137–5147. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2284

Table 3.

Risk factors of clinical and quantitative PET/CT parameters for PFS analyzed by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses

Covariate Univariate analyses Multivariate analyses
HR 95% CI P‐Value HR 95% CI P‐Value
NCCN‐IPI risk groups 0.000
Low
Low‐intermediate 1.79 0.21, 15.36 0.59
High‐intermediate 5.72 0.73, 45.2 0.098
High 17.49 2.17, 140.99 0.007
TMTV0 (>80.74) 10.32 2.42, 44.084 0.002
TLG0 (>1036.61) 10.39 2.43, 44.39 0.002 10.42 2.35, 46.30 0.002
TMTV1 (>4.32) 6.93 2.97, 16.17 0.000
TLG1 (>14.07) 6.25 2.68, 14.56 0.000 2.39 0.93, 6.16 0.072
%ΔSUVmax (<86.02) 5.60 1.66, 18.88 0.005 4.86 1.27, 18.54 0.021

CI, confidence interval; HR, hazards ratio; MTV, metabolic tumor volume; NCCN‐IPI, National Comprehensive Cancer Network International Prognostic Index; PFS, progression‐free survival; SUVmax, maximum standardized uptake value; TLG, total lesion glycolysis. The subscripts 0 and 1 represent baseline and interim measures, respectively. The MTV variables were not included in the multivariate model owing to their correlation with the TLG variables.