TABLE 1.
Study/country | Participants | Physical activity | Cognitive tests | Statistical adjustment | Results after full adjustment |
Dik et al., 2003/Netherlands | 1,241 – M (48.7%) and F (51.3%), aged 62–85 (mean 74.9), CI excluded, No info on ethnicity | 15–25 years Asked retrospectively no. of hours per week | GCF (MMSE), SP (Alphabet coding task-15) | Confounders: age, sex, verbal intelligence, SES, lifestyle (early life physical work, current physical activity, smoking, alcohol), health indicators (diabetes, cardiac disease, depression) | GCF – no significance, SP – M only positive association for low (beta = 0.97) and mod (0.67) high – insignificant negative association (−1.04) |
Fritsch et al., 2007/United States | 349 – M (42.4%) and F (57.6%), aged 74 – 76 (mean 74.8), CI excluded, 99.7% white | 16–18 years Information collected from yearbooks – grouped according to number of physical activities | GCF (TICS-m), SP (Timed months of the year backward test), episodic memory (Logical memory A subtest of the wechsler memory scale), verbal fluency (animal naming) | Path analysis for: sex, teen IQ, parent’s SES, HS physical, mental, social activities, ML mental, physical and social occupational demands, education | No association |
Middleton et al., 2010/United States | 9344 – only F, ≥65 years (mean 71.6), “primarily white” – no figures provided | “teenage” Asked retrospectively about low, mod, high intensity exercise – modified Paffenbarger questionnaire | GCF (mMMSE) | Confounders: age, education, marital status, diabetes, hypertension, depressive symptoms, smoking, BMI | Physically active lower prevalence of CI vs. inactive – 8.5 vs. 16.7% 0.65 OR (0.53–0.80) |
M, men; F, female; CI, individuals with cognitive impairment; GCF, global/general cognitive functioning; SP, speed processing; HS, high school; ML, midlife.