Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 7;32(10):1611–1620. doi: 10.5713/ajas.18.0780

Table 1.

Thermal denaturation temperature and denaturation enthalpy of beef in different treatments

Treatments T1 (°C) ΔH1 (J/g) T2 (°C) ΔH2 (J/g)
Control 66.07±0.4a 1.553±0.02a 79.30±0.5a 0.434±0.04b
DW 65.89±0.5a 1.572±0.01a 79.22±0.4a 0.478±0.03a
UDW 65.19±0.3a,b 1.317±0.02b 78.01±0.5a,b 0.471±0.02a
AMP 64.12±0.4b 1.315±0.03b 77.82±0.6b 0.366±0.04c
UAMP 63.30±0.3c 1.279±0.02b 76.25±0.4c 0.315±0.01d

Data are expressed as mean±standard deviation (n = 3).

DW, deionized water marination; UDW, ultrasound followed by deionized water; AMP, adenosine 5′-monophosphate treatment; UAMP, ultrasound followed by adenosine 5′-monophosphate marination.

a–d

Means in the same column with different letters mean significantly different (p<0.05).