Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 3.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS Behav. 2016 May;20(5):951–966. doi: 10.1007/s10461-015-1204-x

Table 3.

Comparison of characteristics between EBIs and non-EBIs, EIs and non-EIs included in PRS Best Practices Review

Characteristics 5 EBIs
n (%)
12 Non-EBIs
n (%)
5 Els
n (%)
2 Non-EIs
n (%)
Outcomes
 Linkage to HIV care 1 (20) 1 (8) 1 (20) 2 (100)
 Retention in HIV care 3 (60) 9 (75) 4 (80) 0
 Both 1 (20) 2 (17) 0 0
 Re-engagement 0 0 0 0
Location
 U.S. 4 (80) 9 (75) 5 (100) 2 (100)
 International 1 (20) 3 (25) NA NA
Primary Setting
 Clinic only 4 (80) 11 (92) 4 (80) 2 (100)
 Clinic & Communityb 1 (20) 1 (9) 1 (20) 0
Specific Population Focusc
 African American/black 0 0 2 (40) 0
 Hispanic/Latino 0 0 3 (60) 0
 Youth or young persons 0 1(9) 2 (40) 0
 MSM 0 0 1 (20) 0
 Women only 0 1(9) 0 0
 Persons with substance use or mental health issues 1(20) 1(9) 0 0
 Recently incarcerated 0 1(9) 0 0
 Veterans 0 1(9) 0 0
Study-Related
 Baseline sample size (min, max) 96,1838 60,10095 43,11039 6, 28a
 Percent Persons of Color (mean) 81% 86% 88% NR
 Percent Women (mean) 36% 48% 22% NR
a

Sample sizes reflect the number of persons testing HIV positive.

b

Community-based organizations, field settings

c

Multiple responses possible

EBI = Evidence-based intervention

EI = Evidence-informed intervention

NR = Not reported