Compliance rates for participant-tracking sensors (n=212) and environment sensors (n=244) in the case study.
| Sensor type and signals | Sensors | Participant who opted, n (%) | Total hours | Compliance ratea, n (%) | Definition of compliance | |
| Participant-tracking | ||||||
|
|
Cardio, sleep, and steps | Fitbit | 208 (98.1) | 236,725 | 152 (73.1) | Average fraction of days per participant with >12 hours of data |
|
|
Cardio, breath, and motion | OMsignal | 208 (98.1) | 44,240 | 125 (60.1) | Average fraction of work days per participant with >6 hours of data |
|
|
Audio | Jelly | 184 (86.8) | 37,065 | 131 (61.8) | Average fraction of work days per participant with >6 hours of data |
|
|
Locality | Jelly+Owl-in-one | 184 (86.8) | 37,065 | 131 (61.8) | Average fraction of work days per participant with >6 hours of data |
| Environment | ||||||
|
|
Temperature, humidity, and motion | Minews | — | — | 239 (98.0) | Uptime of the sensor network |
aCompliance is computed as the presence of data exceeding half of the measurement period per day among the participants who opted in for each sensor.