Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 3.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Sep 4;24(24):6265–6276. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0444

Table 1.

Association between the HOXB13 rs138213197 and CIP2A rs2278911 variants and the risk of prostate cancer

Locus genotype Case, n (%) Control, n
(%)
OR (95% CI) P value
DISCOVERY COHORT (TAMPERE)
HOXB13 rs138213197
CC 2502 (93.7) 2403 (99.2) 1.0
CT 166 (6.20) 20 (0.80) 7.9 (4.9-12.7) 1.22E-24
TT1 1 (0.10) 0 (0.00) - -
T carriers 167 (6.24) 20 (0.80) 8.0 (5.0-12.8) 7.69E-25
CIP2A rs2278911
CC 2063 (75.3) 1785 (73.5) 1.0
CT 625 (22.8) 588 (24.2) 0.9 (0.8-1.1) 0.236
TT 50 (1.80) 54 (2.20) 0.8 (0.6-1.2) 0.308
T carriers 675 (24.7) 642 (26.5) 0.9 (0.8-1.0) 0.139
Dual carriers of HOXB13 and CIP2A
HOXB13 C&CIP2A C 2620 (98.2) 2369 (97.8) 1.0
HOXB13 T&CIP2A T 46 (1.70) 2 (0.10) 21.2 (5.2 - 87.5) 0.000024
VALIDATION COHORT (STOCKHOLM)
HOXB13 rs138213197
CC 3022 (96.5) 1418 (99.2) 1.0
CT 108 (3.44) 11 (0.77) 4.6 (2.5-8.6) 1.57E-6
TT1 2 (0.06) 0 (0.00) - -
T carriers 110 (3.51) 11 (0.77) 4.7 (2.5-8.7) 1.15E-6
CIP2A rs2278911
CC 2455 (78.4) 1103 (77.2) 1.0
CT 626 (20.0) 303 (21.2) 0.9 (0.8-1.1) 0.345
TT 51 (1.63) 23 (1.61) 1.0 (0.6-1.6) 0.988
T carriers 677 (21.6) 326 (22.8) 0.9 (0.8-1.1) 0.365
Dual carriers of HOXB13 and CIP2A
HOXB13 C&CIP2A C 3104 (99.1) 1427 (99.9) 1.0
HOXB13 T&CIP2A T 28 (0.89) 2 (0.14) 6.4 (1.5 – 27.0) 0.011
VALIDATION COHORT (TAMPERE2)
HOXB13 rs138213197
CC 1067 (92.4) 1178 (99.5) 1.0
CT 88 (7.6) 6 (0.50) 16.2 (7.1-37.2) 5.15E-11
TT1 0 (0.00) 0 (0.00) - -
T carriers 88 (7.6) 6 (0.77) 16.2 (7.1-37.2) 5.15E-11
CIP2A rs2278911
CC 857 (74.2) 871 (73.6) 1.0
CT 272 (23.5) 295 (24.9) 0.9 (0.8-1.1) 0.441
TT 26 (2.3) 18 (1.5) 1.5 (0.8-2.7) 0.196
T carriers 298 (25.8) 313 (26.4) 0.9 (0.8-1.2) 0.727
Dual carriers of HOXB13 and CIP2A
HOXB13 C&CIP2A C 1129 (97.7) 1166 (98.5) 1.0
HOXB13 T&CIP2A T 23 (2.0) 1 (0.10) 24.0 (3.2 – 178.3) 0.002

Case-control logistic regression analyses; OR, odds ratio, CI, confidence interval;

1

OR couldn't be calculated because of the limitations of log regression method; Results are in bold & grey highlighted, if the 95% CI excluded 1 and the association significant at p<0.05 vs. controls;