Table 3.
Hepatitis C seroprevalence studies in incarcerated populations and homeless populations
| Reference | Location | Study Dates | Total No. Tested | No. HCV Antibody-Positive | HCV Antibody Prevalence | No. HCV RNA-Positive | HCV RNA Prevalence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incarcerated | |||||||
| Akiyama et al.29 | New York, NY | 2013-2014 | 10,856 | 2234 | 20.6% | -- | 11.8%a |
| Cocoros et al.30 | Barnstable County, MA | 2009-2011 | 596 | 122 | 20.5% | 23 | 15.2%b |
| de la Flor et al.31 | Dallas County, TX | 2015-2016 | 3,042 | 500 | 16.4% | -- | 9.5%a |
| Kuncio et al.32 | Philadelphia, PA | 2012 | 1,289 | 154 | 11.9% | -- | 6.9%a |
| Mahowald et al.33 | Pennsylvania | 2004-2012 | 101,727 | 18454 | 18.1% | 5288 | 12.6%b |
| Schoenbachler et al.34 | Durham County, NC | 2012-2014 | 669 | 88 | 13.2% | 66 | 10.7%b |
| Stockman et al.35 | Wisconsin | 2014-2015 | 1,239 | 155 | 12.5% | 110 | 9.1%b |
| Mean prevalence: | 16.1% | 10.7% | |||||
| Homeless | |||||||
| Coyle et al.36 | Philadelphia, PA | 2012-2014 | 1,079 | 159 | 14.7% | 108 | 10.8%c |
| Mean prevalence: | 14.7% | 10.8% | |||||
Calculated as (reported HCV Antibody Prevalence) x (NHANES 2013-2016 HCV RNA prevalence), where NHANES 2013-2016 HCV RNA prevalence among antibody positives=0.575
Calculated as (Number HCV RNA-Positive/Number Tested HCV RNA) x (reported HCV Antibody Prevalence)
Calculated as (reported HCV Antibody Prevalence) x (Number HCV RNA-Positive/(0.924 x Number HCV Antibody-Positive)), where the calculation is adjusted by the 92.4% of study participants reported to have received RNA testing
Abbreviations: HCV, hepatitis C virus