Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 13;16(16):2894. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16162894

Table 2.

Pre- and post-walk mean scores, and post-walk contrasts between-treatment conditions for psychological and cognitive outcome measures by green and suburban conditions (n = 23).

Outcome Measures Green Suburban Between Condition Contrast
Pre-Walk Post-Walk Pre-Walk Post-Walk
mean ± SE mean ± SE mean (95% CI)
STAI-S a 30.0 ± 1.4 28.2 ± 1.6 29.5 ± 1.4 30.6 ± 1.6 −2.5 (−4.5, −0.5)
PANAS b
 Positive Affect 35.3 ± 1.5 37.6 ± 1.6 * 35.9 ± 1.5 35.6 ± 1.5 2.0 (0.2, 3.9)
 Negative Affect 11.5 ± 0.6 11.0 ± 0.4 11.7 ± 0.6 11.7 ± 0.4 −0.7 (−1.4, 0.04)
BDS c 6.5 ± 0.4 6.4 ± 0.4 6.6 ± 0.4 6.5 ± 0.4 −0.1 (−0.8, 0.5)

Notes. a STAI-S (anxiety): range 10–40, higher scores = greater anxiety; b PANAS (Positive Affect and Negative Affect): range 10–50, higher scores on positive and negative affect = higher positive or negative emotional states, respectively; c BDS (directed-attention): range 0–14, higher scores = higher directed-attention; within-condition, pre- to post-walk mean score changes: * p = 0.003, p = 0.04.