Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 28;9(8):e029878. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029878

Figure 2.

Figure 2

CCG-level rates of stress urinary incontinence procedures between 2013 and 2016. The figure shows the EB estimated procedure rates for stress urinary incontinence. The vertical axes in (A) and (B) are EB rates. Rates in (B) are risk-adjusted for age, socioeconomic status, ethnicity and long-term illness. The numbers on the horizontal axis represent the assigned position of the CCG ranked according to rates. Geographical mapping in (C) highlight the locations of CCGs with the lowest to highest range of procedure rates in England as well as an expanded section of the London Commissioning Region. CCGs were not labelled because of space constraints. CCG, Clinical Commissioning Group; EB, empircal Bayes.