Table 2.
Subpanel cancer lineb | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I | II | III | IV | V | VI | VII | VIII | IX | |
No. of cell lines in each subpanel | 5 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 2 | 6 |
1h | 2.25 | 3.12 | 2.35 | 2.48 | 1.44 | 2.81 | 2.97 | 2.11 | 2.25 |
1i | 1.15 | 1.67 | 1.00 | 1.29 | 0.94 | 2.41 | 1.67 | 0.99 | 2.32 |
1j | 0.41 | 0.85 | 0.54 | 0.55 | 0.71 | 1.16 | 0.80 | 0.44 | 0.74 |
1l | 0.72 | 1.48 | 0.68 | 1.58 | 1.03 | 2.02 | 1.51 | 1.13 | 2.06 |
Sorafenib | 2.43 | 2.25 | 2.19 | 2.33 | 1.87 | 2.88 | 2.94 | 2.58 | 2.17 |
Mean IC50 values were calculated by dividing the summation of IC50 values of the compound over cell lines of the same cancer type by the number of cell lines in the subpanel. bI: Leukemia; II: non-small cell lung cancer; III: colon cancer; IV: CNS Cancer; V: melanoma VII: ovarian cancer; VII: renal cancer; VIII: prostate cancer; IX: breast cancer. Bold figures indicate superior potency than the reference drug, Sorafenib.