Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 8;8(8):293. doi: 10.3390/antiox8080293

Table 1.

Nutritional value (g/100 g fresh weight (fw)) and energetic value (kcal/100 g fw) of purslane stems and leaves in relation to harvesting stage (mean ± SD).

Harvest Stage
(DAS) *
Plant Part Moisture (%) Fat Proteins Ash Carbohydrates Energy
29 Stems 88.49 ± 0.41c 0.111 ± 0.002a 1.31 ± 0.01b 2.48 ± 0.09a 7.6 ± 0.1a 47 ± 9a
Leaves 91.00 ± 0.49a 0.157 ± 0.001b 1.57 ± 0.02c 2.14 ± 0.05b 5.13 ± 0.02c 43.2 ± 0.1c
43 Stems 91.97 ± 0.08a 0.091 ± 0.001b 0.76 ± 0.01c 1.78 ± 0.03b 5.40 ± 0.02b 35.54 ± 0.03c
Leaves 90.81 ± 0.16a 0.148 ± 0.002b 1.91 ± 0.01b 1.89 ± 0.05c 5.25 ± 0.03b 45.70 ± 0.02b
52 Stems 91.31 ± 0.1b 0.111 ± 0.003a 1.44 ± 0.01a 1.74 ± 0.04b 5.39 ± 0.03b 41.52 ± 0.02b
Leaves 88.16 ± 0.41b 0.230 ± 0.001a 2.96 ± 0.04a 2.40 ± 0.06a 6.2 ± 0.1a 61.3 ± 0.1a
Student’s t Plant Part ** <0.001 <0.001 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01

* DAS: days after sowing. Different Latin letters (a–c) in the same column refer to significant differences between harvest stages for the same plant part (stems or leaves) at p = 0.05. ** Comparison of means of different plant parts (stems and leaves) from the same harvest was performed with Student’s t-test at p = 0.05.