Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 16;16(16):2942. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16162942

Table 3.

Scores of Risk Assessment Index System (RAIS) by experts.

Indicators The importance Value of RAIS a The level Value of RAIS b, d
E1 c E2 E3 E4 E5 E1 E2 E3 E4 E5
Environmental factor 2 3 4 2 3 / / / / /
Human factor 2 2 2 3 1 / / / / /
Equipment factors 3 2 3 1 3 / / / / /
Management factors 1 1 1 1 2 / / / / /
Architectural layout 5 4 2 3 5 8 6 7 9 7
Weather 2 2 3 2 4 9 9 8 9 10
External traffic 3 3 4 4 3 7 8 9 8 9
Public health environment 1 1 1 3 2 9 10 8 8 9
Social stability 4 5 5 5 4 10 9 10 10 9
Crowd characteristic 3 3 2 3 1 7 9 8 8 10
Negligence behavior 4 1 4 3 4 9 8 9 8 8
Macroscopic fundamental diagram 1 2 2 4 2 9 8 9 8 9
Safety awareness 5 5 4 5 4 7 6 7 6 8
Panic 2 4 5 2 5 8 9 7 7 8
Exit 2 1 1 2 1 9 7 8 7 9
Guide sign 5 3 2 4 2 5 6 5 6 4
Alarm system 3 3 4 3 3 5 5 5 6 6
Firefighting system 4 4 4 5 4 6 6 7 7 6
Broadcasting monitoring system 1 2 2 1 2 10 10 9 9 10
Personnel training 1 2 2 1 2 6 5 7 6 8
Public health management 4 2 1 2 3 8 9 8 8 7
Infrastructure management 3 4 4 4 5 9 6 7 8 7
Event organization and management 2 3 3 3 4 8 7 7 6 8
Emergency evacuation management 2 1 2 1 1 8 6 6 8 7

Note: a denotes the importance value of risk assessment index system (RAIS), which is from 1–5. b denotes the level value of risk assessment index system (RAIS), which is from 1–10. c means the Expert 1. d a five-level risk assessment standard is proposed by the standard [47,48], the description of which is excellent, good, satisfactory, fair and poor. Next, the use of 10-scores scale that defines criterion for the hazard, is generally preferable to quantitative analysis, which are excellent (8 ~ 10], good (6 ~ 8], satisfactory (4 ~ 6], fair (2 ~ 4] and poor (0 ~ 2].