Table 3.
Indicators | The importance Value of RAIS a | The level Value of RAIS b, d | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E1 c | E2 | E3 | E4 | E5 | E1 | E2 | E3 | E4 | E5 | |
Environmental factor | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | / | / | / | / | / |
Human factor | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | / | / | / | / | / |
Equipment factors | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | / | / | / | / | / |
Management factors | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | / | / | / | / | / |
Architectural layout | 5 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 7 |
Weather | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
External traffic | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 |
Public health environment | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 10 | 8 | 8 | 9 |
Social stability | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 10 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 9 |
Crowd characteristic | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 10 |
Negligence behavior | 4 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 |
Macroscopic fundamental diagram | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 |
Safety awareness | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 8 |
Panic | 2 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 7 | 8 |
Exit | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 9 |
Guide sign | 5 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 4 |
Alarm system | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
Firefighting system | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
Broadcasting monitoring system | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 10 |
Personnel training | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 8 |
Public health management | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7 |
Infrastructure management | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 7 |
Event organization and management | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 8 |
Emergency evacuation management | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 7 |
Note: a denotes the importance value of risk assessment index system (RAIS), which is from 1–5. b denotes the level value of risk assessment index system (RAIS), which is from 1–10. c means the Expert 1. d a five-level risk assessment standard is proposed by the standard [47,48], the description of which is excellent, good, satisfactory, fair and poor. Next, the use of 10-scores scale that defines criterion for the hazard, is generally preferable to quantitative analysis, which are excellent (8 ~ 10], good (6 ~ 8], satisfactory (4 ~ 6], fair (2 ~ 4] and poor (0 ~ 2].