Table 5.

Results of comparison with different methods.

Method	Acc (%)	SN (%)	Pre (%)	MCC (%)
This paper	95.9	96.72	95.04	91.81
Zhang1	82.11	80.4	84.73	80.07
SP-SVM2	70	66	72	—
LDA-SVM3	69	63	72	—
PSEAAC_SVM4	68	63	70	—
Yunus5	93.45	89.29	89.84	85.71

¹The result was taken from Table 4 of Zhang et al.'s literature [26]. ^2–4These results were taken from in Table 5 of Xiao-Yong et al.'s literature [29]. ⁵This was from Table 7 of Göktepe and Kodaz's literature [31].