Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 9;16(16):2843. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16162843

Table 2.

Differences between the control and experimental group in terms of the efficacy variables at baseline (pre-intervention).

Basal Response Variables Groups
All Patients
n = 52 (100%)
Control
n = 22 (42.31%)
Experimental
n = 30 (57.69%)
p-Value
WOMAC
General 8.40 (3.03) 7.82 (1.82) 8.83 (3.65) 0.57
Stiffness 3.27 (1.30) 3.77 (1.11) 2.90 (1.32) 0.02
Functional capacity 27.67 (8.53) 27.32 (7.21) 27.93 (9.49) 0.91
Lattinen
General 12.06 (3.30) 12.09 (3.28) 12.03 (3.38) 0.72
Intensity 2.50 (0.90) 2.59 (0.96) 2.43 (0.86) 0.7
Frequency 2.83 (0.90) 2.77 (0.92) 2.87 (0.90) 0.79
Analgesics 2.12 (0.83) 1.91 (0.81) 2.27 (0.83) 0.11
lncapacity 1.94 (0.64) 2.00 (0.62) 1.90 (0.66) 0.58
Pain induced insomnia 2.46 (1.31) 2.68 (1.25) 2.30 (1.34) 0.27
EuroQoL 9.25 (1.68) 9.50 (1.85) 9.07 (1.55) 0.4
HAQ 1.28 (0.51) 1.38 (0.47) 1.21 (0.54) 0.14
Yesavage depression 1.63 (1.60) 1.55 (1.30) 1.70 (1.80) 0.93
Baseline Session 1 VAS 4.98 (2.54) 4.89 (2.95) 5.04 (2.31) 0.94

Average (and standard deviation) shown. Differences were assessed using the Mann-Whitney test and by calculating the corresponding p-value. WOMAC: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index; HAQ: Health Assessment Questionnaire; VAS: Visual Analog Scale.