Table 2.
Implementation sustainability outcome measures for patient outcomes
| Implementation phases | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | Active | Sustainability | |
| Organizational readiness (Measuring Organizational Readiness for patient Engagement survey) | ✓ | ||
| Clinician attitudes to PDAs (ADOPT: Attitudes toward Decision Aids fOr PatienTs survey) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Percentage of eligible patients receiving intervention (primary outcome measure) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Quality of shared decision-making process using Observer OPTION-5 | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Utility of tools and approach (clinician interviews) | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Normalization Process Theory: NOMAD Toolkit (interviews) | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Intervention fidelity assessment using observer checklist | ✓ | ||
| Patient outcomes | |||
| Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (UFS-QOL) symptom severity subscale (8-items) | ✓ | ✓ | |
| collaboRATE (three items) | ✓ | ✓ | |
| The Comprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST)—one selected item | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Resource utilization (ambulatory and hospital visits) | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Intended and received treatment | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Chew health literacy measure (one item) | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Patient demographics (email address, health insurance status, age, race, gender, and spoken language) | ✓ | ✓ | |