Table 2.
Run ID | Run Order | X1 | X2 | X3 | SILM (mg/g DW) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Run ID#1 | 17 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 2.24 ± 1.80 |
Run ID#2 | 24 | 0 | −1 | −1 | 6.99 ± 4.11 |
Run ID#3 | 26 | +1 | −1 | −1 | 4.33 ± 3.09 |
Run ID#4 | 21 | −1 | 0 | −1 | 2.55 ± 4.61 |
Run ID#5 | 22 | 0 | 0 | −1 | 9.66 ± 1.44 |
Run ID#6 | 6 | +1 | 0 | −1 | 6.51 ± 3.06 |
Run ID#7 | 10 | −1 | +1 | −1 | 4.37 ± 1.72 |
Run ID#8 | 27 | 0 | +1 | −1 | 8.45 ± 4.48 |
Run ID#9 | 7 | +1 | +1 | −1 | 6.88 ± 4.82 |
Run ID#10 | 18 | −1 | −1 | 0 | 3.21 ± 0.34 |
Run ID#11 | 12 | 0 | −1 | 0 | 12.12 ± 1.57 |
Run ID#12 | 8 | +1 | −1 | 0 | 6.15 ± 1.08 |
Run ID#13 | 25 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 1.80 ± 1.50 |
Run ID#14 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14.25 ± 0.51 |
Run ID#15 | 16 | +1 | 0 | 0 | 9.79 ± 2.47 |
Run ID#16 | 23 | −1 | +1 | 0 | 2.49 ± 1.59 |
Run ID#17 | 11 | 0 | +1 | 0 | 12.88 ± 3.35 |
Run ID#18 | 14 | +1 | +1 | 0 | 9.13 ± 1.80 |
Run ID#19 | 15 | −1 | −1 | +1 | 2.49 ± 0.33 |
Run ID#20 | 3 | 0 | −1 | +1 | 16.00 ± 0.35 |
Run ID#21 | 13 | +1 | −1 | +1 | 7.27 ± 0.36 |
Run ID#22 | 9 | −1 | 0 | +1 | 4.20 ± 0.30 |
Run ID#23 | 5 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 16.71 ± 0.19 |
Run ID#24 | 19 | +1 | 0 | +1 | 10.05 ± 0.48 |
Run ID#25 | 4 | −1 | +1 | +1 | 4.04 ± 0.30 |
Run ID#26 * | 20 | 0 | +1 | +1 | 17.98 ± 0.66 |
Run ID#27 | 2 | +1 | +1 | +1 | 8.54 ± 0.94 |
Values are the mean ± RSD of 3 independent replicates except for *, which correspond to the highest SILM content here determined by 6 independent experiments to confirm this value.