Skip to main content
PMC home page
Antioxidants logoLink to Antioxidants
. 2019 Jul 25;8(8):241. doi: 10.3390/antiox8080241

The Health-Benefits and Phytochemical Profile of Salvia apiana and Salvia farinacea var. Victoria Blue Decoctions

Andrea F Afonso 1,2, Olívia R Pereira 3, Ângela S F Fernandes 3, Ricardo C Calhelha 3, Artur M S Silva 1, Isabel CFR Ferreira 3, Susana M Cardoso 1,*
PMCID: PMC6721217  PMID: 31349575

Abstract

Salvia apiana and Salvia farinacea var. Victoria Blue decoctions were screened for diverse bioactivities, including the ability to counteract oxidative and inflammatory events, as well as to act as cytotoxic and antimicrobial agents. Both extracts showed good activities and that of S. apiana origin was particularly effective regarding the ability to prevent lipid peroxidation and to prevent nitric oxide (NO●) production in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-activated murine macrophage RAW 264.7 cell line (EC50 = 50 μg/mL). Moreover, it displayed high cytotoxic capacity against hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2, cervical carcinoma HeLa, and breast carcinoma cells MCF-7, but comparatively low effects in porcine liver primary cells, which highlights its selectivity (GI50 = 41–60 μg/mL vs. 362 μg/mL, respectively). Further, it exhibited inhibitory and lethal potential against a panel of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. It is possible that the bioactive properties of the two Salvia extracts are associated to their phenolic components and, in the particular case of S. apiana, to its richness in phenolic terpenes, namely in rosmanol, hydroxycarnosic acid and a derivative of sageone, which were found in the extract.

Keywords: sage, bioactivity, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, cytotoxicity, antibacterial, phenolic compounds, terpenes

1. Introduction

In normal physiological conditions, cells maintain a redox homeostasis, i.e., the balance between reactive species formation and their elimination. Still, when equilibrium is disrupted, oxidative stress is settled and the overproduction of reactive species causes several mitochondrial and cellular damages, namely in lipids, proteins, DNA, and other macromolecules. Ultimately, these events are known to be associated with aging and the onset and/or development of distinct diseases, including cancer [1,2]. In this context, diet supplementation with plant-based products rich in phytochemicals are believed to counteract oxidative-related events, thus contributing to human health [1,3,4].

Salvia is the largest genus of the Lamiaceae family, with over 900 species [5] claimed for their richness in essential oils and/or phenolic compounds [6,7,8,9], a fact that is closely associated to their usage in traditional medicine and potential applications in distinct industries, including food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetics [4,10]. Salvia farinacea var. Victoria Blue and Salvia apiana are two edible Salvia plants native to southwestern regions of the USA and Mexico. The first is a perennial shrub that typically grows to be 45–90 cm, whose gray-green leaves are drooping, irregularly-serrate, ovate-lanceolate, and contain a compact multi-branched rich violet-blue flowers spikes, resembling lavender [11,12,13]. In turn, S. apiana, also known as white sage, is a branched shrub growing up to 1.5 m, with silvery white petiolate leaves highly aromatic, and white to pale lavender flowers [14,15].

Although lowly exploited, S. apiana has been previously studied regarding its essential oils composition, which are known to contain high amounts of terpenes and terpene derivatives, particularly β-pinene, α-pinene, borneol, 1,8-cineole, campholenic acid, and β-caryophyllene [13,16]. Moreover, phytochemical analysis of hydroethanolic or acetone extracts of this species have allowed the identification of distinct diterpenes and triterpenes, as well as the flavonoids cirsimaritin and salvigenin [17,18]. Still, as far as we know, the biological properties of polar extracts from S. apiana aerial parts were limited to the screen of the cannabinoid or opioid receptors activity of an ethanolic extract [17] and the potential cytotoxicity against leukemia cell lines of a methanolic extract [19]. With regard to S. farinacea var. Victoria Blue, both chemical and biological properties of polar extracts remain unexplored. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate potential biological effects of S. apiana and S. farinacea var. Victoria Blue, having in mind the traditional usage of Salvia species, which have been used for centuries in the form of infusions and decoctions. The antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, cytotoxicity, and antibacterial potencies of decoctions will be associated with their specific phenolic components.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

Rosmarinic acid and the 7-O-glucoside derivatives of apigenin, luteolin, eriodyctiol, quinic acid, caffeic acid, 5-O-caffeoylquinic acid, 4-O-hydroxybenzoic acid, salvianolic acid B, caffeic acid, ferulic acid, and 4-O-coumaric acid were obtained from Extrasynthese (Genay Cedex, France). Trolox, sulforhodamine B (SRB), DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) radical, acetic acid, ellipticine, trypan blue, trichloroacetic acid (TCA), Tris, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), carnosol, nisin, ascorbic acid, and butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co (St Louis, MO, USA). Fetal bovine serum (FBS), L-glutamine, trypsin-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), penicillin/streptomycin solution (100 U/mL and 100 mg/mL, respectively), Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 Medium and Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) were from Hyclone (Logan, Utah, UT, USA). The Griess reagent system was purchased from Promega Corporation (Madison, WI, USA). Mueller-Hinton agar was from VWR (Prolabo Chemicals, USA); formic acid and ethanol was from Panreac (Barcelona, Spain). n-Hexane, methanol, and acetonitrile were purchased from Lab-Scan (Lisbon, Portugal). Purified water was obtained from a Direct-Q® water purification system (Merck Life Science, Darmstadt, Germany).

2.2. Plant Material

The S. apiana and S. farinacea var. Victoria Blue species were collected from the fields of Coimbra College of Agriculture, Portugal, GPS coordinates 40.211439, −8.451251. After collection, its aerial parts were dried in a ventilated incubator at 35 °C for 3 days and kept in a dark room until use.

2.3. Preparation of Extracts

Extraction of the phenolic compounds was performed by decoction, following a method previously described [20] with slight changes. Briefly, the aerial parts (flowers, leaves, and stems) of sage plants were boiled for 15 min (5 g of plant in 100 mL of water), filtrated, and concentrated to about half of the volume in a rotary evaporator, to reduce the amount of water, followed by defatting with n-hexane (1:1 v/v). Traces of n-hexane in the aqueous phase were eliminated by rotary evaporation before freeze-drying. The resulting extract was kept under vacuum in a desiccator in the dark and a stock water solution (10 mg/mL) was prepared just before the analysis.

2.4. Identification and Quantification of Phenolic Compounds

Ultra-high Performance Liquid Chromatography coupled to Diode Array Detector and an Electrospray Mass Spectrometer (UHPLC-DAD-ESI/MSn) analyses of phenolic profiles from the two decoctions (5 mg/mL) were carried out on an Ultimate 3000 (Dionex Co., San Jose, CA, USA) apparatus equipped with an ultimate 3000 Diode Array Detector (Dionex Co., San Jose, CA, USA) and a Thermo LTQ XL mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA), following a method previous described [21]. Gradient elution was carried out with a mixture of 0.1% (v/v) of formic acid in water (solvent A) and acetonitrile (solvent B). The solvent gradient used consisted of a series of linear gradients starting from 5% of solvent B and increasing to 23% at 14.8 min, to 35% at 18 min, and to 100% at 21 min over three minutes, followed by a return to the initial conditions. The mass spectrometer used was a Thermo Xcalibur Qual Browser (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) and the operations were carried out using the conditions previously described [22]. Quantification was performed by the external standard method using the calibration curves of structurally-related standard compounds. Considering the nature of the phenolic compounds, their quantification was performed at 280, 320, or 340 nm, also considering the limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ). LOD and LOQ were determined from the parameters of the calibration curves, being defined as 3.3 and 10 times the value of the regression error divided by the slope, respectively [21].

2.5. Antioxidant Activity

2.5.1. DPPH● Scavenging Test

The extracts capacity for scavenging DPPH• was evaluated following the procedure previously described by Catarino et al. [23]. Ascorbic acid was used as positive control and the results were expressed as EC50 values (sample concentration providing 50% of antioxidant activity).

2.5.2. Ferric Reducing Power Assay

The ability of the two sage extracts to reduce iron (III) to iron (II) was carried out according to a procedure described before [23], on which the antioxidant compounds from the extracts form a colored complex with potassium ferricyanide, trichloroacetic acid, and ferric chloride, measurable at 700 nm. BHA (2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol) was used as positive control and the results were expressed as EC50 values.

2.5.3. Thiobarbituric Acid Reactive Substances (TBARS)

The decrease in thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) was evaluated by the inhibition of lipid peroxidation in porcine (Sus scrofa) brain homogenates, according to a procedure described by Martins et al. [24]. The color intensity of the malondialdehyde-thiobarbituric acid (MDA-TBA) was measured as its absorbance at 532 nm; the inhibition ratio (%) was calculated using the following equation: [(A−B)/A] × 100%, where A and B were the absorbance of the control and the sample solutions, respectively. Trolox was used as positive control and the results were expressed as EC50 values.

2.5.4. β-Carotene Bleaching Assay

β-carotene linoleate general assay was performed as described by Barros et al. [25]. Trolox was used as positive control and the results were expressed as EC50 values.

2.6. Anti-Inflammatory Activity

The extracts ability in scavenging the NO radical was evaluated in the mouse macrophage-like cell line RAW 264.7 following the general procedure previously described [26]. Cells were treated under 5% CO2 in humidified air, using DMEM culture medium enriched with 10% heat inactivated fetal bovine serum, glutamine, and antibiotics at 37 °C. For the tests, cells were seeded in 96-well plates (150,000 cells/well) and allowed do attach to the plate overnight. Then, these were treated with extract solutions (concentration of 25 and 100 µg/mL, for each extract) for 1 h, followed by the stimulation with LPS (1 μg/mL) for 18 h. The effect of all the tested samples in the absence of LPS was also evaluated, in order to observe if they induced changes in nitric oxide (NO●) basal levels. Dexamethasone (50 µM) was used as a positive control while negative controls had no added LPS. The NO levels produced were determined by the Griess reaction, used for measuring the nitrite accumulation in the culture supernatant on macrophage cell line RAW 264.7 [26]. The anti-inflammatory activity of each extract was determined by calculating EC50 values (μg/mL), which corresponds to the sample concentration that provides 50% inhibition of NO production.

2.7. Cytotoxic Effect in Four Human Tumor Cell Lines

The cytotoxic effect of S. apiana and S. farinacea var. Victoria Blue extracts towards four human tumor cell lines were carried out by the sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay, using the conditions established by Souza et al. [26]. The tumor cell lines MCF-7 (breast adenocarcinoma), NCI-H460 (non-small cell lung cancer), HeLa (cervical carcinoma), and HepG2 (hepatocellular carcinoma), were maintained in enriched medium, at 37 °C, in a humidified air incubator containing 5% CO2. Each cell line was plated at an appropriate density (7.5 × 103 cells/well for MCF-7 and NCI-H460 or 1.0 × 104 cells/well for HeLa and HepG2) in 96-well plates. The cytotoxicity results were expressed as GI50 values (μg/mL), corresponding to sample concentration that inhibited 50% of the cell growth. Ellipticine was used as positive control.

2.8. Cytotoxic Effect in Non-Tumor Liver Cells

The cytotoxicity of the sage extracts were tested by hepatotoxicity assay, in a primary non-tumor cell culture obtained from porcine liver (PLP2) following the described procedures [26]. For the tests, cells were seeded (at 1.0 × 104 cells/well) in enriched medium. Results were expressed as GI50 values (μg/mL) and ellipticine was used as a positive control.

2.9. Antimicrobial Activity

The antibacterial potential of the S. apiana and S. farinacea var. Victoria Blue species was evaluated against five bacterial strains, including Gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus epidermidis NCTC 11047 and Staphylococcus aureus NCTC 6571) and Gram-negative bacteria (Salmonella typhimurium NCTC 12023, Escherichia coli NCTC 9001, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa NCTC 10662) from the National Collection of Type Cultures, operated by Public Health England, Salisbury, United Kingdom. All strains were cultured in Mueller-Hinton agar and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of aqueous solutions of both Salvia species were determined by the broth microdilution method using an adapted method previous described by Afonso et al. [21]. MIC is defined as the lowest concentration at which visible growth is inhibit, while MBC is the lowest concentration of the tested substance which has a bactericidal effect. Briefly, bacterial suspensions were prepared by direct colony suspensions and a final inoculum of 1.5 × 105 CFU/mL was required for final suspensions that was diluted in a 1:100 ratio in Mueller-Hinton broth. Next, 100 microliters of this medium was dispensed into wells of 96-well micro titer plates and S. apiana and S. farinacea var. Victoria Blue decoctions were added and serially diluted four times across the plate. Then, 100 microliters of bacteria suspension was added to each well and the plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The assay for each pathogen was repeated three times [27] MBC values are determined by sub-culturing from each negative well onto Mueller-Hinton agar and confirmation the lowest concentration with no visible growth [28]. Nisin was used as the positive control.

2.10. Statistical Analysis

The results were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 6 (GraphPad Software, CA, USA). Data were expressed as mean ± S.D. of 3–4 independent experiments performed at least in triplicate. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s test was used to detect any significant differences among different means. The p-value less than 0.05 were assumed as significant difference.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Antioxidant Activity

Many plants, including Salvia species, have been evaluated for their claimed antioxidant capacities and/or ability to ameliorate oxidative-stress related disorders, as these properties are commonly associated to the richness in phenolic compounds [4,29].

The antioxidant activity of Salvia decoctions was evaluated by four generalized methods: DPPH●, ferric reducing power assay, bleaching of β-carotene, and TBARS. Globally, S. apiana decoction presented superior antioxidant capacity than that of S. farinacea var. Victoria Blue, a trend that was particularly evident with respect to lipid peroxidation events (Table 1), with EC50 values obtained of about one-eighth or the same magnitude of the commercial standard, in the TBARS and β-carotene bleaching assays, respectively. Regardless of being less active, it is important to note that S. farinacea var. Victoria Blue extract may also be considered as a promising antioxidant agent, since EC50 values in all tests were only 1.8–3.7-fold those of the standard compounds.

Table 1.

Antioxidant activity (EC50, μg/mL) of S. apiana and S. farinacea var. Victoria Blue decoctions.

Assay S. apiana S. farinacea var. Victoria Blue Standard
AA BHA Trolox
DPPH• 13.3 ± 1.1 a 17.4 ± 5.5 a 6.7 ± 0.7 b
Ferric reducing power 55.0 ± 5.6 a 59.9 ± 3.6 a 16.1 ± 2.0 b
TBARS 2.79 ± 0.1 a 42.2 ± 0.6 b 23.0 ± 1.0 c
β-carotene bleaching inhibition 41.2 ± 1.6 a 153.5 ± 2.2 b 41.7 ± 0.3 a
Open in a new tab

AA: Ascorbic acid; BHA: butylated hydroxyanisole; DPPH: 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl; TBARS: thiobarbituric acid reactive substances. EC50: half maximal effective concentration, corresponding to 50% of extract antioxidant activity or 0.5 of absorbance in ferric reducing power assay. Means followed by the same letters in rows do not differ according to Tukey’s test (p < 0.05).

As far as we know, the antioxidant capacities of S. apiana and S. farinacea var. Victoria Blue polar extracts have not been exploited before. However, the promising abilities herein reported for decoctions agree and/or, in particular in the case of S. apiana, have exceeded those previously described for sage plants [6,7,30,31].

3.2. Anti-Inflammatory Aactivity

Nitric oxide produced in high concentrations by macrophages has been reported to be involved in inflammation and compounds targeting its production are considered as good candidates for attenuating inflammatory-related diseases [32]. In our study, the potency of S. apiana and S. farinacea var. Victoria Blue extracts to counteract NO● production was evaluated in an LPS-activated RAW 264.7 macrophage model. As shown in Table 2, both extracts were effective. Particularly, S. apiana was promising, as its potency corresponded to about one-third of the drug dexamethasone (EC50 = 49.9 ± 2.5 and 16.0 ± 1.0, respectively). Moreover, their activity seems to be superior to that described by Ravipati et al. [33] and Jang et al. [34] for commercial aqueous extracts of Salvia miltiorrhiza (EC50 = 200 μg/mL) and for the 80% ethanolic extracts of aerial parts and of roots of Salvia plebeia (EC50 between 500–1000 and superior to 1000 μg/mL), albeit that the absence and/or use of a different reference compound by the authors hamper more solid conclusions. In addition, no relationship was made by the authors between the anti-inflammatory effects and the possible compounds involved.

Table 2.

Anti-inflammatory (EC50, μg/mL) and cytotoxicity properties (GI50, μg/mL) of S. apiana and S. farinacea var. Victoria Blue decoctions.

Effect S. apiana S. farinacea var. Victoria Blue Standard
Anti-inflammatory activity Dexamethasone
NO● production 49.9 ± 2.5 a 80.8 ± 0.4 b 16.0 ± 1.0 c
Cytotoxicity to tumor cell lines Ellipticine
HepG2 (hepatocellular carcinoma) 40.9 ± 3.3 a 87.4 ± 5.4 b 1.0 ± 0.2 c
HeLa (cervical carcinoma) 57.3 ± 5.1 a 77.8 ± 3.5 b 2.0 ± 0.1 c
MCF-7 (breast carcinoma) 60.2 ± 4.2 a 59.8 ± 0.1 a 1.0 ± 0.04 b
NCI-H460 (non-small cell lung cancer) 245.7 ± 6.3 a 279.5 ± 10.1 b 1.0 ± 0.1 c
Cytotoxicity to non-tumor cells
PLP2 growth inhibition 361.7 ± 5.3 a 335.4 ± 8.0 b 3.0 ± 1.0 c
Open in a new tab

Results of anti-inflammatory activity are expressed in EC50 values: sample concentration providing 50% of inhibition of nitric oxide (NO●) production. Cytotoxicity results are expressed in GI50 values (half maximal inhibition concentration) corresponding to the sample concentration achieving 50% of growth inhibition in human tumor cell lines or in liver primary culture PLP2. Means followed by the same letters in rows do not differ according to Tukey’s test (p < 0.05).

3.3. Cytotoxic Activity

The effect of the two Salvia decoctions on the growth of tumor and non-tumor cell lines was evaluated by the SRB assay. In general, both Salvia extracts showed promising cytotoxic effects against tumoral cell lines, particularly hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2, cervical carcinoma HeLa, and breast carcinoma cells MCF-7 (Table 2). Further, between the two extracts, S. apiana exhibited more cytotoxicity than S. farinacea var. Victoria Blue, a fact that was clear in HepG2 cells (GI50 of 40.9 ± 3.3 vs. 87.4 ± 5.4 μg/mL, respectively) and HeLa (GI50 of 57.3 ± 5.1 vs. 77.8 ± 3.5 μg/mL, respectively). Note that the data seems to agree with the results of Saeed et al. [19], who reported a high cytotoxic effect of S. apiana methanolic extracts against both sensitive and multidrug-resistant leukemia cells (IC50 values of 7.17 ± 0.67 and 9.91 ± 0.8 μg/mL, respectively), as assessed by the resazurin reduction assay. Although our results cannot be directly compared to those reported previously for other plants (due to the absence or use of different standards or methodologies), they generally reinforce the theory that polar extracts of sage plants may act as cytotoxic agents. In fact, other authors have previously highlighted cytotoxic effects for such extracts, e.g., Salvia eremophila methanolic or hydromethanolic extracts, which were effective in breast cancer MCF-7 cell lines (IC50 values of 47.7 and 75.2 μg/mL, respectively), with 7 to 11 fold less potency of the drug cisplatin [35]. Using the MTS assay, Jiang et al. [36] also highlighted a high cytotoxicity capacity of ethanolic and acetone extracts from S. miltiorrhiza roots against HepG2 cell lines (IC50 = 17.3 and 83.2 µg/mL, respectively), as well as of Salvia officinalis roots and leaves (IC50 = 19.6–43.8 µg/mL and 64.4–90.0 µg/mL, respectively).

Moreover, our results also indicated that the anti-proliferative activity of S. apiana and S. farinacea var. Victoria Blue decoctions were tumor-selective, as reflected by comparatively low GI50 values in the cancer cell lines with regard to those of PLP2 cells (GI50 = 361.7 and 335.4 μg/mL, respectively). This ability to discriminate tumor cells is essential to minimize cytotoxic effects in normal cells, and has also been described for other Salvia polar extracts, including S. officinalis, which regardless being cytotoxic to MCF-7 cancer cells (IC50 = 142.4 μg/mL), showed no significant effects against normal human umbilical vein endothelial cell cells (IC50 values above 600 µg/mL) [37].

3.4. Antibacterial Activity

The antibacterial potential of the two Salvia decoctions towards the Gram-positive bacteria S. aureus and S. epidermidis and the Gram-negative bacteria S. typhimurium, E. coli and P. aeruginosa are summarized in Table 3. In general, S. apiana had promising antibacterial properties, with inhibitory and lethal capacity at concentrations equal or below to 0.69 mg/mL (for S. aureus and S. epidermidis) and of 2.75 mg/mL (for the S. typhimurium, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa), which corresponded to only 3–5 times less that of the drug nisin. This contrasted with S. farinacea var. Victoria Blue decoction, that only showed relevant antibacterial effect towards the Gram-positive bacteria S. aureus (MIC and MBC of 1.06 and 2.12 mg/mL, respectively).

Table 3.

Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) of S. apiana and S. farinacea var. Victoria Blue decoctions and nisin against selected test bacteria.

Bacteria S. apiana S. farinacea var. Victoria Blue Nisin
MIC MBC MIC MBC MIC MBC
Gram-positive
S. epidermidis 0.34 0.69 8.50 8.50 <0.63 <0.63
S. aureus 0.69 0.69 1.06 2.12 <0.63 <0.63
Gram-negative
S. typhimurium 2.75 2.75 >8.5 >8.5 0.5 0.5
E. coli 2.75 2.75 8.5 8.5 0.5 1.0
P. aeruginosa 2.75 2.75 >8.5 >8.5 1.0 1.0
Open in a new tab

MIC and MBC are expressed as mg/mL.

As far as we know, the antibacterial effects of S. apiana and S. farinacea var. Victoria Blue polar extracts have not been previously exploited. Still Córdova-Guerrero et al. [38] has remarked the antimicrobial activity of a S. apiana hexane extract against Gram-positive bacteria, using the agar disc diffusion assay, for which they obtained an inhibition hale of S. aureus in the range of 10 to 24 mm at 0.34–2.7 µg/µL. Unfortunately, as the authors did not present the MIC value, a direct comparison to our results is not possible. Nonetheless, other authors have previously described promising antimicrobial effects of polar extracts of sage species. For example, Ibrahim et al. [39] described a powerful activity of Salvia bicolor methanolic extract against a distinct Gram-positive bacteria, especially on S. aureus and S. epidermidis (MIC values of 0.2 and 0.35 mg/mL, respectively) and Gram-negative bacteria (MIC values in the range 0.4 to 1 mg/mL) [39], a fact that the authors associated with its richness in phenolic compounds, which were mostly gallic, p-coumaric and protocatechuic acids, and flavonoids (e.g., luteolin-7-O-glucoside). Moreover, when screening the antimicrobial potential of hydromethanolic extracts of different Salvia species through the nutrient-broth microdilution assay, Firuzi et al. [35] reinforced that S. eremophila, Salvia limbata, Salvia santolinifolia, and Salvia sclarea extracts were able to inhibit the growth of a panel of six microorganisms, with MIC values in the range of 0.31–5 mg/mL.

3.5. Characterization of the Extracts

Not surprisingly, the levels of phenolic compounds in Salvia decoctions were significantly different, with that from S. apiana being about six times richer than S. farinacea var. victoria (Table 4). Moreover, regardless of being rich in rosmarinic acid (56.8 and 17.8 mg/g extract, respectively) as in general for polar extracts from Salvia plants, the two extracts differed with regard to their phenolic constituents, as well as to those previously reported for Salvia elegans, Salvia greggii, and S. officinalis decoctions [40]. Indeed, S. apiana decoction was characterized by its richness in terpenes derivatives (peaks 41 and 43–47, in Figure 1 and Table 4), which were mainly represented by rosmanol ([M−H]− at m/z 345 → 301, 271, 283), a derivative of sageone ([M−H]− at m/z 361) and hydroxycarnosic acid ([M−H]− at m/z 347 → 303, 273), with estimated levels of 192.4 ± 17.1, 174.1 ± 14.1 and 69.7 ± 11.2 mg/g extract, respectively, and other less abundant ones, including carnosol, carnosic acid, and tetrahydrohydroxyrosmariquinone (peaks 45, 46, and 47, respectively), in addition to some flavonoids (hesperidin, quercetin-O-hexoside, and cirsimaritin). These results strengthen those previously reported [17,18,41], allowing to conclude that polar extracts from S. apiana are particularly rich in phenolic terpenes. It should be noted that among the compounds herein detected in the decoction of S. apiana, rosmanol, and hydroxycarnosic acid were previously described in the acetone extracts [18], while carnosol, sageone, and carnosic acid were reported in aqueous ethanolic and/or methanolic extracts from the same plant [17,41].

Table 4.

Identification and quantification of the compounds identified in S. apiana and S. farinacea var. Victoria Blue decoctions determined by UHPLC-DAD-ESI-MSn.

NF Rt UVmax
(nm)		 [H–M]− MS/MS Fragments
(m/z)		 Probable Compound S. apiana * S. farinacea Var. Victoria Blue *
1 1.5 275 149 103, 87, 131, 59 DimethylBA - 5.9 ± 0.1
2 1.7 205 191 111, 173 Quinic Ac 5.0 ± 0.3 0.4 ± 0.01
3 3.6 280 197 179, 73, 153 Danshensu D D
4 4.4 261, 289 153 109 Protoc Ac D -
5 5.1 290sh, 324 353 191, 179, 135 cis 3-O-CQA D -
6 5.4 294sh, 322 353 191, 179, 135 trans 3-O-CQA - D
7 7.9 309 337 163 Coum Quinic Ac D 0.3 ± 0.03
8 8.3 313 295 163 p-Coum Ac Pent 0.4 ± 0.04 -
9 8.8 290sh, 325 353 191 trans 5-O-CQA - 0.6 ± 0.03
10 9.5 290sh, 325 353 173, 179, 191 4-O-CQA 5.5 ± 0.1 -
11 9.7 290sh, 323 179 135 Caffeic Ac - 0.8 ± 0.0
12 9.8 314 325 265, 235, 163 Coum Hex - 0.3 ± 0.0
13 11.8 311 337 191, 163 Coum Quinic Ac D 0.2 ± 0.0
14 12.8 287sh, 324 367 173, 191 Fer Quinic Ac - D
15 13.0 309 225 207, 181, 165, 163 Coum Ac Der 1.8 ± 0.1 -
16 13.1 291sh, 311 637 351, 285, 193 Ferulic Ac Der - 0.5 ± 0.0
17 13.5 274 571 527, 483, 439, 373 YA E (isom1) - 8.4 ± 0.01
18 13.9 256, 267, 345 447 327, 357 Lut-C-Hex - 3.2 ± 0.02
19 14.7 274 571 527, 509, 553, 483, 285 YA E (isom2) - 4.5 ± 0.2
20 15.0 235, 277 539 297, 359, 377, 279, 315 YA D/isomer - 3.9 ± 0.3
21 15.2 268, 336 431 311, 341, 269 Api-C-Hex - 5.9 ± 0.6
22 15.6 285, 315 555 409, 391, 537, 511, 365 SA K - D
23 15.8 255, 350 463 301 Querc-O-Hex 14.6 ± 0.3 -
593 285 Lut Rut D -
24 16.1 255, 266, 345 461 285 Lut-7-O-GlcA - 15.8 ± 0.02
25 16.5 274 571 527, 409 YA E (isom3) - 1.0 ± 0.08
26 17.6 268, 336 575 431, 341, 311, 513, 413 Api Hex HMG - 6.3 ± 0.02
27 17.9 283 719 359, 539, 521, 341 Sag Ac (isom1) D 2.1 ± 0.08
28 18.1 269, 329 431 269 Api-O-Hex - 16.7 ± 0.05
29 18.3 238, 341 607 299, 284 Chrys-O-Rut D -
30 18.4 267, 337 445 269, 175 Api-O-GlcA - 2.2 ± 0.01
31 18.6 270, 291, 326sh 717 555, 519, 475, 357 SA B (isom1) - D
32 18.7 284, 330sh 609 301 Hesperidin 41.3 ± 2.2 -
33 19.0 290sh, 328 359 161, 179, 197, 223 RA 56.8 ± 0.6 17.8 ± 0.1
34 19.5 285sh, 305 537 493, 295 CaffRA (isom1) - 1.0 ± 0.04
35 19.8 278 719 521, 341, 359 Sag Ac (isom2) - 2.2 ± 0.02
36 20.2 290sh, 333 537 493, 359, 375 CaffRA/ SA I (isom2) D -
37 20.6 267, 336 517 269, 473 Api malonyl Hex - 2.5 ± 0.03
38 21.5 287sh, 320 373 179, 161, 135, 197, 355, 329 Methyl Rosmarinate - 0.6 ± 0.02
39 21.8 290 491 163, 329, 119 Coumaric Ac Der 0.5 ± 0.01 -
40 22.4 281, 330sh 717 537, 357 SA B (isom2) 6.6 ± 0.4 -
41 23.7 199, 229, 287 361 299, 269, 281, 213, 343 Sageone Der 174.1 ± 14.1 -
42 24.3 275, 333sh 313 298, 283, 269 Cirsimaritin 25.9 ± 0.6 -
43 25.0 207, 237sh, 285 345 301, 271, 283 Rosmanol 192.4 ± 17.1 -
44 25.2 286 347 303, 273 Hydroxycarnosic Ac 69.7 ± 11.2 -
45 25.7 286 329 285 Carnosol 17.3 ± 0.7 -
46 26.3 262 331 287 Carnosic Ac 14.3 ± 0.7 -
47 26.4 277 301 271, 283 Tetrahydrohydroxyrosmariquinone 17.4 ± 0.2 -
Total 643.3 ± 18.9 102.1 ± 0.7
Open in a new tab

* Values expressed as mg/g of extract; NF—Number of peak represented in Figure 1; D—Detected; Ac—Acid; Api—Apigenin; BA—Benzoic acid; Caff—Caffeoyl; CQA—Caffeoylquinic acid; Chrys—Chrysoeriol; Coum—Coumaroyl; Der—Derivative; Fer—Feruloyl; Glc—Glucoside; GlcA—Glucuronide; Hex—Hexoside; HMG—3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaroyl; Lut—Luteolin; Pent—Pentoside; Protoc—Protocatechuic; Querc—Quercetin; Rt—Retention time; Rut—Rutinoside; RA—Rosmarinic acid; Sag—Sagerinic; SA—Salvianolic acid; sh—shoulder; YA—Yunnaneic acid.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Chromatographic representation of Salvia decoctions at 280 nm: (a) S. apiana; (b) S. farinacea var. Victoria Blue. Numbers in the figure correspond to the UHPLC-DAD-ESI-MSn peaks described in Table 4.

Although less rich in phenolic compounds, in addition to rosmarinic acid, S. farinacea var. Victoria Blue decoction presented moderate quantities of common flavones to the Salvia plants, namely apigenin-O-hexoside (peak 28, 16.7 mg/g extract) and luteolin-O-glucuronide (peak 24, 15.8 mg/g extract) [42,43,44].

Thus, our study suggests that the high bioactivity of S. apiana decoction is associated with its fertility in phenolic components, namely flavonoids and terpene derivatives. In fact, the diterpene rosmanol (the most predominant compound in S. apiana extract) and its derivatives were previously associated with the high antioxidant potential of S. officinalis [45,46] and the cytotoxic activity of several other Salvia plants [8]. In addition, sageone is an abietane diterpenoid reported to occur in S. apiana species [17] and described to exert antiviral activity [8]. Moreover, others, including carnosol and carnosic acid, are claimed to exert several biological properties, including lipase inhibitory activity [47], antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and antitumoral [45,46,48]. Naturally, the possible contribution of other components of the extract, including cirsimaritin, which have already been considered relevant in the antibacterial and antioxidant activities of Salvia species [8,46] should not be overlooked.

4. Conclusions

The antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, cytotoxic and antibacterial properties of S. apiana and S. farinacea var. Victoria Blue decoctions were reported in the present work, allowing us to conclude that both have potential bioactive effects, which was extremely promising, particularly with regard to the counteract of key events in oxidative stress, showing EC50 values of 2.79 µg/mL and 41.2 µg/mL in TBARS and β-carotene bleaching assays, respectively. Decoction of S. apiana also had an effect on the suppression of inflammatory events, since it displayed a third of the potency of the drug dexamethasone to inhibit NO● production by LPS-activated RAW 264.7 macrophages. In addition, this decoction was selective for tumors, exhibiting cytotoxic capacity in cancer cell lines with low cytotoxic effect in normal cells. Moreover, it exerted inhibitory and lethal potential against five bacteria (MIC and MBC equal or below to 0.69 and 2.75 mg/mL for Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, respectively). It is possible that the great bioactive potential of this decoction might be partially associated to its high levels in phenolic compounds (643.3 ± 18.9 µg/mg), particularly in rosmanol, a derivative of sageone, and hydroxycarnosic acid. In turn, although promising, the bioactivity of S. farinacea var. Victoria Blue was in general significantly lower than that of S. apiana and also contained modest levels of phenolic compounds (102.1 ± 0.7 µg/mg) comprised of moderate quantities of rosmarinic acid and glycosidic forms of the flavones apigenin and luteolin. The promising biological activities of S. apiana and S. farinacea var. Victoria Blue species herein found through in vitro methods suggest that decoctions of these species, and particularly that of S. apiana, might be useful for the application in the food and pharmaceutical industry, although their health-promoting potencies need to be further proved in vivo and pre-clinical studies.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Eng. Filipe Melo from the School of Agriculture of the Polytechnic Institute of Coimbra, for providing the plant material.

Author Contributions

A.F.A. contribution to investigation, data curation, and writing the original draft. O.R.P. contribution to conceptualization, data curation, supervision, and writing—review and editing. Â.S.F. contribution to investigation (antioxidant assays). R.C.C. contribution to investigation (cellular assays), writing—review and editing. A.M.S.S. contribution to resources and writing—review. I.C.F.R.F. contribution to conceptualization, resources and writing—review. S.M.C. contribution to conceptualization, data curation, supervision, resources and writing—review.

Funding

Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT), the European Union, the National Strategic Reference Framework (QREN), the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER), and Operational Programme Competitiveness Factors (COMPETE), for funding the Organic Chemistry Research Unit (QOPNA) (FCT UID/QUI/00062/2019) and Mountain Research Center (CIMO) (UID/AGR/00690/2019), through national funds and where applicable co-financed by the FEDER, within the PT2020 Partnership Agreement. A. Fernandes and R. Calhelha thank the national funding by FCT, P.I., through the institutional scientific employment program-contract. Project AgroForWealth (CENTRO-01-0145-FEDER-000001), funded by Centro2020, through FEDER and PT2020, financed the research contract of Susana M. Cardoso.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Lin D., Xiao M., Zhao J., Li Z., Xing B., Li X., Kong M., Li L., Zhang Q., Liu Y., et al. An overview of plant phenolic compounds and their importance in human nutrition and management of type 2 diabetes. Molecules. 2016;21:1374. doi: 10.3390/molecules21101374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Guillaumet-Adkins A., Yañez Y., Peris-Diaz M.D., Calabria I., Palanca-Ballester C., Sandoval J. Epigenetics and Oxidative Stress in Aging. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2017;14:17643–17663. doi: 10.1155/2017/9175806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Li A.N., Li S., Zhang Y.J., Xu X.R., Chen Y.M., Li H.B. Resources and biological activities of natural polyphenols. Nutrients. 2014;6:6020–6047. doi: 10.3390/nu6126020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Brewer M.S. Natural Antioxidants: Sources, Compounds, Mechanisms of Action, and Potential Applications. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2011;10:221–247. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-4337.2011.00156.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Walker J.B., Sytsma K.J., Treutlein J., Wink M. Salvia (Lamiaceae) is not monophyletic: Implications for the systematics, radiation and ecological specializations. Am. J. Bot. 2004;91:1115–1125. doi: 10.3732/ajb.91.7.1115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jeshvaghani Z.A., Rahimmalek M., Talebi M., Goli S.A.H. Comparison of total phenolic content and antioxidant activity in different Salvia species using three model systems. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015;77:409–414. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.09.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Alimpić A., Knežević A., Milutinović M., Stević T., Šavikin K., Stajić M., Marković S., Marin P.D., Matevski V., Duletić-Laušević S. Biological activities and chemical composition of Salvia amplexicaulis Lam. extracts. Ind. Crops Prod. 2017;105:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.04.051. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jassbi A.R., Zare S., Firuzi O., Xiao J. Bioactive phytochemicals from shoots and roots of Salvia species. Phytochem. Rev. 2016;15:829–867. doi: 10.1007/s11101-015-9427-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sytar O., Bruckova K., Hunkova E., Zivcak M., Konate K., Brestic M. The application of multiplex fluorimetric sensor for the analysis of flavonoids content in the medicinal herbs family Asteraceae, Lamiaceae, Rosaceae. Biol. Res. 2015;48:5. doi: 10.1186/0717-6287-48-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kumar S., Pandey A.K. Chemistry and biological activities of flavonoids: An overview. Sci. World J. 2013;2013 doi: 10.1155/2013/162750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Turner B.L. Recension of Salvia sect. farinaceae (lamiaceae) Phytologia. 2008;90:163–175. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zhang X., Sawhney V.K., Davis A.R. Annular floral nectary with oil-producing trichomes in Salvia farinacea (lamiaceae): Anatomy, histochemistry, ultrastructure, and significance. Am. J. Bot. 2014;101:1849–1867. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1400368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Giffen J.E., Lesiak A.D., Dane A.J., Cody B., Musah R.A. Rapid Species-level Identification of Salvias by Chemometric Processing of Ambient Ionisation Mass Spectrometry-derived Chemical Profiles. Phytochem. Anal. 2017;28:16–26. doi: 10.1002/pca.2639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ali A., Tabanca N., Demirci B., Blythe E.K. Chemical Composition and Biological Activity of Four Salvia Essential Oils and Individual Compounds against Two Species of Mosquitoes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015;63:447–456. doi: 10.1021/jf504976f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ott D., Hühn P., Claßen-bockhoff R. Salvia apiana—A carpenter bee flower? Flora. 2016;221:82–91. doi: 10.1016/j.flora.2015.12.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Borek T.T., Hochrien J.M., Irwin A.N. Composition of the essential oil of white sage, Salvia apiana. Flavour Fragr. J. 2006;21:571–572. doi: 10.1002/ffj.1618. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Srivedavyasasri R., Hayes T., Ross S.A. Phytochemical and biological evaluation of Salvia apiana. Nat. Prod. Res. 2017;31:2058–2061. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2016.1269096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Luis J.G., Lahlou E.H., Andros L.S., Islands C. Hassananes: C23 terpenoids with a new type of skeleton from Salvia apiana Jeps. Tetrahedron. 1996;52:12309–12312. doi: 10.1016/0040-4020(96)00717-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Saeed M.E.M., Meyer M., Hussein A., Efferth T. Cytotoxicity of South-African medicinal plants towards sensitive and multidrug-resistant cancer cells. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2016;186:209–223. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2016.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ferreira F.M., Dinis L.T., Azedo P., Galhano C.I.C., Simões A., Cardoso S.M., Domingues M.R.M., Pereira O.R., Palmeira C.M., Peixoto F.P. Antioxidant capacity and toxicological evaluation of Pterospartum tridentatum flower extracts. CYTA-J. Food. 2012;10:92–102. doi: 10.1080/19476337.2011.590233. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Afonso A.F., Pereira O.R., Neto R.T., Silva A.M.S., Cardoso S.M. Health-promoting effects of Thymus herba-barona, Thymus pseudolanuginosus, and Thymus caespititius decoctions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017;18:1879. doi: 10.3390/ijms18091879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Afonso A.F., Pereira O.R., Cardoso S.M. Metabolites and Biological Activities of Thymus zygis, Thymus pulegioides, and Thymus fragrantissimus Grown under Organic Cultivation. Molecules. 2018;23:1514. doi: 10.3390/molecules23071514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Catarino M.D., Silva A.M.S., Saraiva S.C., Sobral A.J.F.N., Cardoso S.M. Characterization of phenolic constituents and evaluation of antioxidant properties of leaves and stems of Eriocephalus africanus. Arab. J. Chem. 2018;11:62–69. doi: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2015.04.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Martins N., Barros L., Santos-Buelga C., Henriques M., Silva S., Ferreira I.C.F.R. Evaluation of bioactive properties and phenolic compounds in different extracts prepared from Salvia officinalis L. Food Chem. 2015;170:378–385. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.08.096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Barros L., Ferreira M.J., Queirós B., Ferreira I.C.F.R., Baptista P. Total phenols, ascorbic acid, β-carotene and lycopene in Portuguese wild edible mushrooms and their antioxidant activities. Food Chem. 2007;103:413–419. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.07.038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Souza A.H.P., Corrêa R.C.G., Barros L., Calhelha R.C., Santos-buelga C., Peralta R.M., Bracht A., Matsushita M., Ferreira I.C.F.R. Phytochemicals and bioactive properties of Ilex paraguariensis: An in-vitro comparative study between the whole plant, leaves and stems. Food Res. Int. 2015;78:286–294. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2015.09.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Andrews J.M. Determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2001;48:5–16. doi: 10.1093/jac/48.suppl_1.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Shami A.M.M., Philip K., Muniandy S. Synergy of antibacterial and antioxidant activities from crude extracts and peptides of selected plant mixture. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2013;13:1–11. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-13-360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Piluzza G., Bullitta S. Correlations between phenolic content and antioxidant properties in twenty-four plant species of traditional ethnoveterinary use in the Mediterranean area Correlations between phenolic content and antioxidant properties in twenty-four plant species of tra. Pharm. Biol. 2011;49:240–247. doi: 10.3109/13880209.2010.501083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Koşar M., Göger F., Hüsnü Can Başer K. In vitro antioxidant properties and phenolic composition of Salvia halophila Hedge from Turkey. Food Chem. 2011;129:374–379. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.04.086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kostic M., Petrovic M.B., Jevtovic T., Jovic M., Petrovic A., Slavoljub Ž. Anti-inflammatory effect of the Salvia sclarea L. ethanolic extract on lipopolysaccharide-induced periodontitis in rats. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2017;199:52–59. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2017.01.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Azab A., Nassar A., Azab A.N. Anti-inflammatory activity of natural products. Molecules. 2016;21:1321. doi: 10.3390/molecules21101321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ravipati A.S., Zhang L., Koyyalamudi S.R., Jeong S.C., Reddy N., Bartlett J., Smith P.T., Shanmugam K., Münch G., Wu M.J., et al. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of selected Chinese medicinal plants and their relation with antioxidant content. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2012;12:173. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-12-173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Jang H.H., Cho S.Y., Kim M.J., Kim J.B., Lee S.H., Lee M.Y., Lee Y.M. Anti-nflammatory effects of Salvia plebeia R. Br extract in vitro and in ovalbumin-induced mouse model. Biol. Res. 2016;49:41. doi: 10.1186/s40659-016-0102-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Firuzi O., Miri R., Asadollahi M., Eslami S., Jassbi A.R. Cytotoxic, Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities and Phenolic Contents of Eleven Salvia Species from Iran. Iran J. Pharm. Res. 2013;12:801–810. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Jiang Y., Zhang L., Rupasinghe H.P.V. Antiproliferative effects of extracts from Salvia officinalis L. and Saliva miltiorrhiza Bunge on hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017;85:57–67. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2016.11.113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Shahneh F.Z., Baradaran B., Orangi M., Zamani F. In vitro Cytotoxic Activity of Four Plants Used in Persian Traditional Medicine. Adv. Farm. Bull. 2013;3:453–455. doi: 10.5681/apb.2013.074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Córdova-guerrero I., Aragon-martinez O.H., Díaz-rubio L. Actividad antibacteriana y antifúngica de un extracto de Salvia apiana frente a microorganismos de importancia clínica. Rev. Argent. Microbiol. 2016;48:217–221. doi: 10.1016/j.ram.2016.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ibrahim T.A. Chemical composition and biological activity of extracts from Salvia bicolor desf. growing in Egypt. Molecules. 2012;17:11315–11334. doi: 10.3390/molecules171011315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Pereira O.R., Catarino M.D., Afonso A.F., Silva A.M.S., Cardoso S.M. Salvia elegans, Salvia greggii and Salvia officinalis Decoctions: Antioxidant Activities and Inhibition of Carbohydrate and Lipid Metabolic Enzymes. Molecules. 2018;23:3169. doi: 10.3390/molecules23123169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Abreu M.E., Maren M. Phenolic diterpene and α-tocopherol contents in leaf extracts of 60 Salvia. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2008;88:2648–2653. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.3384. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zimmermann B.F., Walch S.G., Tinzoh L.N., Stühlinger W., Lachenmeier D.W. Rapid UHPLC determination of polyphenols in aqueous infusions of Salvia officinalis L. (sage tea) J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2011;879:2459–2464. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2011.06.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Cvetkovikj I., Stefkov G., Acevska J., Stanoeva J.P., Karapandzova M., Stefova M., Dimitrovska A., Kulevanova S. Polyphenolic characterization and chromatographic methods for fast assessment of culinary Salvia species from South East Europe. J. Chromatogr. A. 2013;1282:38–45. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2012.12.068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Milevskaya V.V., Temerdashev Z.A., Butyl T.S., Kiseleva N.V. Determination of Phenolic Compounds in Medicinal Plants from the Lamiaceae Family. J. Anal. Chem. 2017;72:342–348. doi: 10.1134/S1061934817030091. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.González M.A. Aromatic Abietane Diterpenoids: Their Biological Activity and Synthesis. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2013;32:684–704. doi: 10.1039/C4NP00110A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ghorbani A., Esmaeilizadeh M. Pharmacological properties of Salvia officinalis and its components. J. Tradit. Complement. Med. 2017;7:433–440. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcme.2016.12.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ninomiya K., Matsuda H., Shimoda H., Nishida N., Kasajima N., Yoshino T., Morikawa T., Yoshikawa M. Carnosic acid, a new class of lipid absorption inhibitor from sage. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004;14:1943–1946. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2004.01.091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Johnson J.J. Carnosol: A promising anti-cancer and anti-inflammatory agent. Cancer Lett. 2011;305:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2011.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antioxidants are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES