Table 3.
Prior to increasing dose |
Increased effective dose |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient | Dose ( mg)† | Acid output (meq/hr)‡ | Time taking lansoprazole (months)§ | Reason for increase¶ | Dose (mg)** | Acid output (meq/hr)†† |
1 | 60QD | 12.4 | 6 | Poor control, peptic symptoms | 75QD | 3.9 |
6 | 120QD | 7.8 | 3 | Peptic symptoms | 60BID | 4.1 |
8‡‡ | 60QD | 10.0 | 3 | Poor control | 60BID | 6.8 |
9§§ | 60QD | 10.0 | 12 | Poor control | 60BID | 2.1 |
18¶¶ | 75QD | 4.8–18 | 3 | Peptic symptoms | 120QD | 6.1 |
Abbreviations: QD = 24 hourly; BID = 12 hourly.
Effective dose at prior evaluation.
Acid output immediately prior to requiting upward adjustment of lansoprazole dose.
Duration of therapy with lansoprazole at time of requiring upward adjustment.
Reason dose adjusted upwards as per study design.
Effective dose following upward titration of lansoprazole.
Acid output following effective upward titration (higher of two values).
Patient with widely metastatic disease and hemorrhagic liver metastases who continued to have peptic symptoms that were finally controlled with a 60-rag BID dose.
Patient with MEN-I syndrome who required multiple incremental increases in dose for effective acid control in spite of lack of symptoms.
patient who required multiple increases over a two-week period postoperatively with continued symptoms and repeat acid output controls on 90–105 mg QD of up to 18.1 meq/hr.