Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2019 Jul 16;43(9):1957–1966. doi: 10.1111/acer.14143

Table 3:

Multinomial logistic regression predicting alcohol consequences by level of alcohol use (n=760 attended a party with alcohol in 2015 and 2016)

Any consequence Passed out Not remember Hangover Punished by parents Broke/
damaged/
fight
Sex against will
Drinking level
Model 1: 1+ vs. below binge threshold 7.7 (5.3, 11.1) 7.2 (3.6, 14.4) 7.2 (4.5, 11.6) 7.1 (4.9, 10.2) 1.6 (0.8, 3.1) 6.7 (3.0, 14.9) 5.7 (2.0, 16.7)
Model 2: 12 vs. below binge threshold 6.0 (4.3, 8.3) 4.4 (2.1, 9.0) 4.7 (2.9, 7.5) 6.6 (4.6, 9.3) 1.4 (0.7, 2.8) 4.0 (1.7, 9.3) 3.5 (1.2, 10.5)
Model 2: 2+ vs. below binge threshold 9.9 (5.5, 17.6) 11.9 (5.1, 27.8) 11.2 (5.9, 21.0) 7.6 (4.4, 13.3) 1.7 (0.6, 4.9) 11.2 (4.2, 30.0) 9.4 (2.5, 36.0)
Model 2: 2+ vs. 12 1.7 (0.9, 3.0) 2.7 (1.3, 5.8) 2.4 (1.3, 4.3) 1.2 (0.7, 2.0) 1.2 (0.4, 3.7) 2.8 (1.1, 6.8) 2.7 (0.8, 9.1)
Party Characteristics
Size 1.0 (0.9, 1.2) 1.1 (0.8, 1.6) 1.3 (1.01, 1.7) 1.1 (0.9, 1.3) 1.0 (0.7, 1.4) 1.2 (0.9, 1.8) 0.8 (0.4, 1.4)
Other’s Home (vs. My Home) 0.6 (0.4, 1.1) 0.7 (0.3, 1.7) 0.5 (0.2, 0.9) 0.6 (0.3, 0.98) 1.2 (0.4, 3.4) 0.5 (0.2, 1.3) 0.8 (0.2, 3.3)
Other Place (vs. My Home) 0.6 (0.3, 1.2) 0.9 (0.3, 2.9) 0.6 (0.3, 1.4) 0.6 (0.3, 1.1) 0.8 (0.2, 2.9) 1.1 (0.3, 3.6) 0.3 (0.03, 3.3)
Majority Females (vs. 50/50) 2.0 (1.2, 3.1) 4.4 (2.1, 9.2) 2.1 (1.2, 3.9) 1.6 (0.9, 2.6) 1.9 (0.9, 4.3) 5.6 (2.5, 12.2) 2.3 (0.7, 7.5)
Majority Males (vs. 50/50) 0.8 (0.5, 1.2) 0.6 (0.2, 1.8) 0.7 (0.3, 1.4) 0.6 (0.4, 1.1) 1.9 (0.9, 4.3) 1.7 (0.6, 4.3) 0.3 (0.03, 2.3)
Mostly Over 21 (vs. Mostly Under 21) 1.0 (0.7, 1.4) 1.5 (0.8, 2.9) 0.7 (0.5, 1.1) 1.1 (0.8, 1.5) 0.8 (0.5, 1.6) 1.2 (0.6, 2.4) 1.5 (0.6, 4.1)
Parent supervision: Yes (vs. No) 0.3 (0.2, 0.5) 0.4 (0.1, 1.01) 0.2 (0.1, 0.6) 0.2 (0.1, 0.4) 0.6 (0.3, 1.3) 0.1 (0.01, 0.4) 0.3 (0.03, 2.3)
Saw a lot of people get drunk: Yes (vs. No) 2.6 (1.8, 3.6) 2.8 (1.2, 6.3) 3.1 (1.7, 5.6) 2.5 (1.7, 3.7) 1.9 (0.97, 3.7) 0.8 (0.4, 1.9) 10.8 (1.3, 88.5)
Individual Characteristics
Gender: Female (vs. Male) 0.8 (0.6, 1.1) 0.5 (0.3, 0.9) 0.9 (0.6, 1.4) 0.9 (0.6, 1.2) 1.2 (0.6, 2.1) 0.6 (0.3, 1.1) 2.0 (0.7, 5.3)
Age: 1517 (vs. 1820) 0.9 (0.7, 1.3) 0.6 (0.3, 1.2) 1.0 (0.6, 1.5) 0.9 (0.6, 1.3) 3.2 (1.7, 5.7) 1.2 (0.6, 2.5) 1.3 (0.5, 3.6)
Race: Non-White (vs. White) 1.2 (0.8, 1.7) 1.1 (0.5, 2.2) 0.8 (0.4, 1.3) 1.1 (0.7, 1.6) 1.1 (0.6, 2.3) 1.4 (0.6, 3.3) 0.5 (0.1, 2.2)
Ethnicity: Hispanic (vs. Non-Hispanic) 1.6 (0.999, 2.5) 2.9 (1.3, 6.4) 1.4 (0.7, 2.7) 1.3 (0.8, 2.2) 1.2 (0.5, 2.9) 3.1 (1.3, 7.8) 0.8 (0.1, 6.5)
Mother’s Education: College Degree (vs. Less than College Degree) 1.0 (0.7, 1.4) 0.7 (0.4, 1.3) 0.6 (0.4, 0.99) 1.0 (0.7, 1.4) 0.9 (0.5, 1.7) 1.2 (0.5, 2.5) 0.5 (0.2, 1.4)
Covariates
Status: Intervention (vs. Control) 1.4 (0.97, 1.9) 0.8 (0.4, 1.7) 1.1 (0.6, 1.8) 1.2 (0.8, 1.8) 1.7 (0.9, 3.2) 1.9 (0.8, 4.4) 6.9 (1.9, 25.2)
SHO ever passed: Yes (vs. No) 0.7 (0.5, 1.01) 1.0 (0.5, 2.2) 1.1 (0.7, 1.8) 0.8 (0.5, 1.1) 0.5 (0.3, 0.98) 1.0 (0.4, 2.3) 0.5 (0.2, 1.3)
Year: 2016 (vs. 2015) 0.8 (0.6, 1.1) 0.8 (0.4, 1.4) 0.9 (0.6, 1.4) 0.8 (0.6, 1.1) 0.8 (0.5, 1.5) 0.6 (0.3, 1.1) 1.1 (0.4, 2.8)