Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Sep;44(18):1270–1278. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003061

Table 3 –

Mechanical characteristics from experimental results and FE analysis for standard and growing rod constructs (mean ± standard deviation, for experimental results; value and percent error between experimental and FE, for FE analysis). Statistical significance (p < 0.05) between the standard and growing rod constructs denoted by * and between growing rod constructs of varied lengths (76 and 376mm) denoted by **.

Configuration Stiffness (N/mm) Yield Load (N) Yield Displacement (mm) Maximum Load (N) Maximum Displacement (mm)
Experimental, Standard
 Active Length = 76mm 43 ± 0.4 457 ± 19 12 ± 0.5 1,007 ± 7 65 ± 1.2
Experimental, Growing Rod
 Active Length = 76mm 49 ± 0.8* 522 ± 12* 12 ± 0.1 1,084 ± 11* 62 ± 0.9*
 Active Length = 376mm 10 ± 0.3** 200 ± 2** 28 ± 0.7** 392 ± 5** 134 ± 2.4**
Finite Element, Standard
 Active Length = 76mm 44.3 (‒2.0%) 484.0 (‒6.0%) 12.3 (‒3.8%) 935.9 (7.1%) 66.0 (1.4%)
Finite Element, Growing Rod
 Active Length = 76mm 53.4 (‒7.9%) 503.4 (3.6%) 10.9 (9.8%) 1,068.3 (1.5%) 66.0 (‒5.9%)
 Active Length = 376mm 7.6 (22.1%) 191.6 (4.0%) 32.3 (‒16.4%) 294.8 (24.8%) 136.0 (‒1.5%)