Table 2.
Analysis Method | Instrument | Sampling Method | LOD | Analysis Time | Advantages | Limitations | Suitable for POC Application |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchtop GC[39,40] | GC-FID/TCDa; GC-MS; GCxGC-MS; | Sorbent trap SPME | pptf | Long | Most widely used; High separation capability; Compound identification available; | Bulky size; Heavy weight; Dedicated personnel needed; Sample preparation needed; | No |
Selected Ion Flow Tube[30–32] | SIFT-MS | Direct input | ppbg to ppt | Real time | Rapid analysis; High sensitivity; Allow breath-by-breath analyses; No sample preparation needed; | Bulky size; Heavy weight; High cost; Dedicated personnel needed; | No |
Proton Transfer Reaction [41] | PTR-MS | Direct input | ppb to ppt | Real time | Rapid analysis; High sensitivity; Allow breath-by-breath analyses; No sample preparation needed; | Bulky size; Heavy weight; High cost; Dedicated personnel needed; | No |
Ion Mobility Spectrometry[33–35] | FAIMSb | Direct input | ppmh to ppb | Short | Portable; Fast; No sample preparation needed; | Low separation capability; Background VOC interference; | Yes |
Electronic Nose[21, 36, 37] | AuNPsc; CNTsbd; CPse; Color-metric; | Direct input | ppm to ppb | Short | Easy to use; Highly portable; Low cost; No sample preparation needed; | Low separation capability; Sensors drift overtime; Background VOC interference; | Yes |
Portable GC[42] | Portable GC; Proposed portable 2D GC; | Sorbent trap | sub-ppb | Moderate | Portable; Fully automated; High separation capability; High sensitivity; No sample preparation needed; | More complicated than 1D portable GC | Yes |
Flame ionization detector/Thermal conductivity detector
Field Asymmetric Ion Mobility Spectrometry
Gold nanoparticles
Carbon nanotubes
Conducting polymers
parts-per-trillion, 10−12
parts-per-billion, 10−9
parts-per-million, 10−6