Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Anal Bioanal Chem. 2019 Aug 1;411(24):6435–6447. doi: 10.1007/s00216-019-02024-5

Table 2.

A Summary of Breath Analysis Technologies

Analysis Method Instrument Sampling Method LOD Analysis Time Advantages Limitations Suitable for POC Application
Benchtop GC[39,40] GC-FID/TCDa; GC-MS; GCxGC-MS; Sorbent trap SPME pptf Long Most widely used; High separation capability; Compound identification available; Bulky size; Heavy weight; Dedicated personnel needed; Sample preparation needed; No
Selected Ion Flow Tube[3032] SIFT-MS Direct input ppbg to ppt Real time Rapid analysis; High sensitivity; Allow breath-by-breath analyses; No sample preparation needed; Bulky size; Heavy weight; High cost; Dedicated personnel needed; No
Proton Transfer Reaction [41] PTR-MS Direct input ppb to ppt Real time Rapid analysis; High sensitivity; Allow breath-by-breath analyses; No sample preparation needed; Bulky size; Heavy weight; High cost; Dedicated personnel needed; No
Ion Mobility Spectrometry[3335] FAIMSb Direct input ppmh to ppb Short Portable; Fast; No sample preparation needed; Low separation capability; Background VOC interference; Yes
Electronic Nose[21, 36, 37] AuNPsc; CNTsbd; CPse; Color-metric; Direct input ppm to ppb Short Easy to use; Highly portable; Low cost; No sample preparation needed; Low separation capability; Sensors drift overtime; Background VOC interference; Yes
Portable GC[42] Portable GC; Proposed portable 2D GC; Sorbent trap sub-ppb Moderate Portable; Fully automated; High separation capability; High sensitivity; No sample preparation needed; More complicated than 1D portable GC Yes
a

Flame ionization detector/Thermal conductivity detector

b

Field Asymmetric Ion Mobility Spectrometry

c

Gold nanoparticles

d

Carbon nanotubes

e

Conducting polymers

f

parts-per-trillion, 10−12

g

parts-per-billion, 10−9

h

parts-per-million, 10−6