Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 3;9:12670. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48670-8

Table 1.

Comparison with experimental data5,17,21.

Parameter Month LVFW pacing Simulation LVFW Pacing Experiment (Van Oosterhout et al., 1998) LBBB Experiment (Vernooy et al., 2004) LVFW Pacing Experiment (Prinzen et al., 1995)
LVEDV (% of Normal”) 0 100 100 ± 27.8 100 ± 29.8 100
2 102.3 117.5 ± 12.8
4 104.6 129.8 ± 50.9R
6 109 107.4 ± 29.9M
8 113.7
LVEF (%) 0 48.7 35.3 ± 7.0 43 ± 4 100
2 48.3
4 48.6 33 ± 6R
6 47.8 39.6 ± 8.9M
8 48.3
LVESV (% Change) 0 100 100 100
2 104.9
4 108.7
6 118.5
8 126.4
Early activated region thickness (% change) 0 100L 100L 100C 100L
2 90.3L 90.7 ± 8.7L 88.9 ± 6.8L,R
4 83.9L 87.0 ± 7.2L 79.7 ± 8.0L,R,*
6 81.3L 86.5 ± 16.7L,R
8 79.6L
Late activated region thickness (% Change) 0 100C 100C 100L 100C
2 105.2C 108.4 ± 11.3C 96.8C,M
4 113.7C 110.5 ± 16.8C 103.0 ± 7.5C,M,*
6 119.6C 122.5 ± 11.3C,R
8 127.5C
RV thickness (% Change) 0 100 100 100 100
2 91.4
4 91.1
6 88.6
8 88.7

Mdenotes no significant change over time; Rdenotes significant change over time (p < 0.05).

LDenotes LVFW Thickness; Cdenotes septum thickness.

*Denotes 3 months; denotes not reported or measured.