Table 3.
N classes | Maximum log likelihood | AICa | BICb | Relative entropy | Class parameter | Class 1 | Class 2 | Class 3 | Class 4 | Class 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 716.85 | − 1419.69 | − 1394.43 |
N % APPAc |
273 100% 1.000 |
|||||
2d | 1076.39 | − 2130.79 | − 2091.09 | 0.878 |
N % APPA |
210 77% 0.971 |
63 23% 0.968 |
|||
3 | 1095.99 | − 2161.98 | − 2107.84 | 0.889 |
N % APPA |
20 7% 0.965 |
202 74% 0.968 |
51 19% 0.905 |
||
4 | 1095.99 | − 2153.98 | − 2085.40 | 0.549 |
N % APPA |
20 7% 0.965 |
198 73% 0.507 |
0 0% 0.000 |
55 20% 0.870 |
|
5 | 1095.99 | − 2145.98 | − 2062.97 | 0.428 |
N % APPA |
20 7% 0.965 |
0 0% 0.000 |
0 0% 0.000 |
193 71% 0.344 |
60 22% 0.824 |
Trajectory function was weekly adherence = a0 + a1 * week + a2 * week2. No covariates were included
aAkaike Information Criterion
bBayesian Information Criterion
cAverage posterior probability of assignment
dPreferred model