Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 25;11(8):1710. doi: 10.3390/nu11081710

Table 3.

Effects of MiPo supplementation on high-density lipoproteins (HDL) size distribution, determined by protein.

HDL Subclasses (%) Sample Time (n = 11)
0 h 4 h 8 h
n = 11
HDL2b Pre 30.8 (15.9–35.0) 31.5 (16.9–40.3) a 38.6 (18.8–42.3) a
Post 31.5 (17.3–40.3) a 32.8 (19.3–40.7) b 31.7 (18.2–42.1)
HDL2a Pre 14.3 (10.9–16.4) 15.0 (10.9–16.6) 16.0 (12.5–18.7)
Post 15.0 (12.3–17.9) 14.6 (12.4–16.6) 14.7 (10.6–16.9)
HDL3a Pre 31.0 (27.8–35.9) 29.2 (27.3–33.5) 28.3 (25.9–32.8) a
Post 27.7 (26.5–34.1) a 29.5 (24.7–34.1) 29.2 (26.0–33.3)
HDL3b Pre 16.9 (12.5–21.8) 14.1 (10.2–21.5) 10.4 (7.8–21.2) a
Post 14.7 (10.0–21.8) 15.7 (8.2–25.6) 15.3 (8.8–23.2)
HDL3c Pre 6.2 (4.6–12.3) 6.4 (3.4–19.3) 4.4 (1.3–15.1)
Post 5.1 (2.6–10.8) 5.5 (2.3–16.8) 7.9 (1.2–21.3) c

Data are expressed as the median (interquartile range) percentage of protein associated with each HDL subclass relative to the total HDL protein, determined during the pre- and post-supplementation periods with MiPo. Wilcoxon test, a p ≤ 0.05 vs. 0 h pre-treatment, b p ≤ 0.05 vs. 4 h pre-treatment, c p ≤ 0.05 vs. 8 h pre-treatment.