Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 15;11(8):1912. doi: 10.3390/nu11081912

Table 2.

Differences in placebo vs. caffeine conditions between experimental trials.

Variable Comparison p Effect Size (Cohen d) Relative Effects [%]
1RM [kg] Placebo vs CAF-9 0.82 0.26—small 3.3 ± 4.1
Placebo vs CAF-11 0.74 0.45—small 4.7 ± 5.1
T-REP [n] Placebo vs CAF-9 0.99 −0.02—negative effects 0.4 ± 12.1
Placebo vs CAF-11 0.93 0.15—small 2.0 ± 11.2
TUTCON [s] Placebo vs CAF-9 0.22 0.6—moderate 10.5 ± 15.5
Placebo vs CAF-11 0.99 −0.05—negative effects −6.2 ± 21.5
MP [W] Placebo vs CAF-9 0.85 −0.19—negative effects −1.5 ± 7.6
Placebo vs CAF-11 0.51 −0.38—negative effects −9.4 ± 10.5
PP [W] Placebo vs CAF-9 0.84 −0.21—negative effects −4.2 ± 8.3
Placebo vs CAF-11 0.48 −0.38—negative effects −9.2 ± 11.6
MV [m/s] Placebo vs CAF-9 0.43 −0.44—negative effects −6.0 ± 11.8
Placebo vs CAF-11 0.91 −0.11—negative effects −1.4 ± 6.6
PV [m/s] Placebo vs CAF-9 0.90 −0.12—negative effects −1.5 ± 10.2
Placebo vs CAF-11 0.04 * −0.84—negative effects −11.2 ± 10.7

All data are presented as mean ± standard deviation; * statistically significant difference p < 0.05; 1RM: One repetition maximum; T-REP: Total number of repetitions; TUTCON: Time under tension during concentric movement; MP: Mean power output; PP: Peak power output; MV: Mean velocity; PV: Peak velocity.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure