Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 28;7:245. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00245

Table 1.

Sample characteristics by control and intervention groups and descriptive statistics of the implementation parameters for the intervention group at 3-months follow-up.

Control group n = 714 Intervention group n = 641
n % n %
Boys 322 45.1 301 47.0
Girls 392 54.9 340 53.0
Grade 8 348 48.7 338 52.7
Grade 9 366 51.3 303 47.3
Age, mean (SD) 14.7 (±0.6) 14.8 (±0.7)
Outcome variables
   Overestimation of peer lifetime binge drinking 323 45.8 241 38.1
   Binge drinking in the last 30 days, mean (SD) 1.1 (±2.4) 1.0 (±2.3)
   Alcohol-related harmsa, mean (SD) 1.6 (±2.2) 1.4 (±2.2)
Participation in The GOOD Life elements
   Feedback session 523 81.6
   Posters 343 53.5
   Web-application 211 32.9
Level of self-reported exposure to The GOOD Life
   Elements
     One element 159 29.6
     Two elements 220 41.0
     Three elements 158 29.4
   Posters
     1–2 posters 67 19.9
     3–4 posters 101 30.0
     5–6 posters 107 31.8
     7–10 posters 62 18.4
Level of satisfaction with The GOOD Life
   Feedback session
     Low satisfaction 35 6.8
     Okay satisfaction 223 43.6
     High satisfaction 253 49.5
   Posters
     Low satisfaction 26 7.7
     Okay satisfaction 159 47.2
     High satisfaction 152 45.1
   Web-application
     Low satisfaction 12 5.8
     Okay satisfaction 105 50.7
     High satisfaction 90 43.5
Level of recall of The GOOD Life
   Feedback session
     Low recall 295 62.9
     High recall 174 37.1
   Posters
     Low recall 166 51.9
     High recall 154 48.1
   Web-application
     Low recall 121 64.4
     High recall 67 35.6
a

Only measured among 540 pupils with lifetime alcohol use due to an error in the electronic questionnaire in the 2016 data collection.