Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 15;8(8):1219. doi: 10.3390/jcm8081219

Table 1.

Best evidence summary—systematic reviews and RCTs if conducted after publication of a relevant systematic review.

Intervention Target Population Level of Evidence Quality of Evidence Effect Size Site of Care Rehabilitation Professions Key References and/or Treatment Manuals
Reassurance, advice, education
Video in ED focussing on activation WAD
(n = 348)
Level I [9] Moderate Small effect compared to no treatment at intermediate follow-up, RR 0.79 (0.59 to 1.06), NNT:23 ED All See systematic review
WAD information pamphlet WAD
(n = 102)
Level I [9] Low No effect compared to generic advice ED All See systematic review
Booklet or email NTNP
(n = 64)
Level 1 [10] Moderate No effect compared to massage or exercise Primary All See systematic review
Booklet/neck school NTNP
(n = 411)
Level 1 [11] Very low to low No effect Primary and secondary All
Exercise
Strengthening (upper quarter) WAD and NTNP
(n = 241)
Level I [12] Moderate Moderate to large at short-term follow-up, SMD (pain) −0.71 (−1.33 to −0.10) Primary and secondary Exercise professionals See systematic review
Office workers with neck pain
(n = 605)
Level I [13] Moderate Moderate effect vs. no intervention, SMD pain = 0.59 (0.29 to 0.89) Workplace
Endurance training (upper quarter) WAD and NTNP
(n = 198)
Level I [12] Moderate Small at short-term follow-up Primary and secondary Physiotherapists See systematic review
Muscle control (stabilisation) WAD and NTNP
(n = 71)
Level I [12] Moderate Small at intermediate-term follow-up
Small to moderate effect on pain in the short to intermediate term (SMD pain −0.59 (95% CI: −0.97 to −0.20))
Primary and secondary Physiotherapists See systematic review
NTNP
(n = 174)
Level 1 [14] Low to moderate Small effect on disability (SMD disability −0.44 (95% CI: −0.81 to −0.08)) vs. other treatments Primary and secondary Physiotherapists
Stretching (neck & shoulder) Workers
(n = 96)
Level II [15] Pedro (8/10) Small effect on pain & disability compared to ergonomic advice (−1.4; 95% CI −2.2 to −0.7 for pain; −4.8; 95% CI −9.3 to −0.4 for disability) Work place Exercise professionals Exercise protocol available at [15]
Eye-neck co-ordination/proprioception WAD & NTNP
(n = 103)
Level I [16] Very low Small effect on pain MD: −1.6 (−3.6 to 0.3) compared to no exercise
Meta-analysis for other outcomes could not be conducted
Primary and Secondary Physiotherapists See systematic review
Qigong WAD and NTNP
(n = 191)
Level I [12] Moderate Small at intermediate-term follow-up Primary and secondary Exercise professionals See systematic review
Yoga NTNP
(n = 686)
Level I * (high heterogeneity) [17] Moderate Moderate effect on pain and disability vs. various other treatments including exercise, SMD pain = −1.13 (−1.60 to −0.66), SMD disability −0.92 (−1.38 to 0.47) Primary and secondary Exercise professionals See systematic review
General exercise WAD, NTNP, workers
(n = 386)
Level I [13,18] No effect Primary and secondary Exercise professionals See systematic review
Psychological treatments alone (CBT) WAD and NTNP
(n = 168)
Level I [19] Very low to moderate Small effect on pain and disability when compared to no treatment, SMD pain = −0.58 (−1.01 to −0.16), SMD disability = −0.61 (−1.21 to −0.01) Primary and secondary Psychology professionals See systematic review
Combined psychological and physical treatments delivered by physiotherapists WAD
(n = 211)
Level I * (high heterogeneity) [20] Moderate quality No effect on pain and disability Primary Physiotherapists See systematic review
Medium effect on fear of avoidance
Acute WAD
(n = 108)
Level II (RCT) [21] NA
Pedro (8/10)
Medium to large effect on pain related disability compared to exercise only Physiotherapists Treatment protocols available at [21]
Exercise and manual therapy WAD and NTNP
(n = 345)
Level I [22] No effect compared to exercise alone Primary and secondary

Levels of Evidence were defined as per the Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine [23]. Quality of Evidence as per reported in Systematic reviews or per Pedro scale for RCTs. * Indicates systematic reviews with high heterogeneity indicating caution is required with interpretation of results. WAD: whiplash associated disorders; NTNP: non-traumatic neck pain; ED: emergency department; SMD: standardised mean difference; MD: mean difference; NNT: number needed to treat.