Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 19;8(8):1251. doi: 10.3390/jcm8081251

Table 3.

Multivariate analysis adjusting with putative variables for the prediction of TTPP and rPFS from the initiation of second line treatment.

TTPP at 2nd Line Radiographic PFS
Variables HR 95%CI p Value HR 95%CI p Value
Treatment sequence
Abi to Enz Ref Ref
Enz to Abi 1.791 1.091 3.163 0.043 1.538 0.855 3.019 0.219
Visceral mets at 2nd line treatment
No
Yes 3.647 1.003 23.634 0.049 3.647 1.182 19.278 0.032
LN mets at 2nd line treatment
No Ref Ref
Yes 1.663 0.847 3.406 0.141 1.233 0.784 2.392 0.221
Bone mets at 2nd line treatment
No Ref Ref
Yes 1.946 0.972 4.071 0.06 1.392 0.872 4.281 0.099
PSA decline ≥50% at first line
No Ref Ref
Yes 0.641 0.401 0.933 0.038 0.865 0.431 1.283 0.492
ECOG-PS
0 Ref Ref
>1 2.154 1.163 4.154 0.014 1.538 0.699 2.193 0.293

TTPP: time to PSA progression, HR: hazard ratio, CI: confidential interval, ECOG-PS: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status