Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 30;11(8):1751. doi: 10.3390/nu11081751

Table 4.

Model fit indices of the cross-lagged panel analyses to examine bi-directionality of parental feeding practices and standardized child body mass index.

n χ2(df) RMSEA (p Close) RMSEA 95% CI CFI TLI CMIN/df
Years of Age Lower Upper
2 to 3 328 24.272 (23) 0.013 (0.962) 0.000 0.048 0.998 0.996 1.055
3 to 4 366 48.002 (23) ** 0.055 (0.337) 0.033 0.076 0.978 0.936 2.087
4 to 5 299 25.104 (23) 0.018 (0.936) 0.000 0.052 0.998 0.995 1.091
5 to 6 358 41.822 (23) * 0.048 (0.529) 0.023 0.071 0.987 0.963 1.818
6 to 7 307 44.900 (23) ** 0.056 (0.321) 0.031 0.080 0.984 0.953 1.952
7 to 8 401 40.227 (23) * 0.043 (0.668) 0.019 0.065 0.992 0.976 1.749
8 to 9 372 24.075 (23) 0.011 (0.978) 0.000 0.045 0.999 0.999 1.047
9 to 10 416 44.411 (23) ** 0.047 (0.553) 0.026 0.068 0.990 0.972 1.931
10 to 11 360 37.133 (23) * 0.041 (0.699) 0.013 0.065 0.993 0.979 1.614
11 to 12 363 43.443 (23) ** 0.050 (0.482) 0.026 0.072 0.990 0.972 1.889

Note: n—number of analyzed parent-child dyads. χ2(df)—chi-square test for goodness of fit (degrees of freedom); RMSEA—root-mean-square error of approximation; CI—confidence interval; CFI—comparative fit index; TLI—Tucker–Lewis index; CMIN/df—minimum discrepancy divided by its degrees of freedom. ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05. coefficients between error terms; single-headed arrows display standardized regression coefficients; dotted arrows indicate non-significant associations. ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05.