Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 28;13:286. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00286

Table 4.

ROI results.

TIA CueE–baseline CueD–baseline CueD–CueE
no Abb Mean SEM t-score p-value Mean SEM t-score p-value t-score p-value
1 LIFGop 0.14 0.04 3.90 <0.001 0.15 0.04 4.00 <0.001 −0.29 0.388
2 LPCG 0.13 0.03 4.21 <0.001 0.15 0.03 4.68 <0.001 −0.83 0.207
3 LIPG 0.22 0.03 6.67 0.000 0.17 0.03 5.00 <0.001 −1.57 0.066
4 LMFG 0.09 0.03 2.92 0.004 0.12 0.03 3.79 <0.001 −1.44 0.082
5 LIFGtri 0.14 0.03 4.52 <0.001 0.18 0.03 5.40 <0.001 −1.14 0.135
6 LMFG 0.11 0.04 2.81 0.005 0.15 0.04 3.57 <0.001 −1.02 0.161
7 LSTG 0.05 0.03 1.58 0.065 −0.01 0.03 0.26 0.400 −2.68 0.0071
8 LMFG 0.11 0.03 3.18 0.002 0.12 0.03 3.40 0.001 −0.35 0.363
9 LSMG 0.11 0.04 3.04 0.003 0.07 0.04 1.95 0.032 −1.07 0.149
10 RIFGop 0.21 0.04 5.80 0.000 0.23 0.04 6.05 0.000 −0.64 0.265
11 RPCUN 0.15 0.03 5.04 <0.001 0.15 0.03 4.98 <0.001 −0.18 0.431
12 RIPG 0.17 0.04 4.18 <0.001 0.17 0.04 4.08 <0.001 0.00 0.498
13 RSFGmp 0.13 0.03 3.77 <0.001 0.15 0.04 4.24 <0.001 −0.96 0.174
14 RMTG 0.09 0.02 4.94 −0.001 0.06 0.02 3.41 0.001 −1.05 0.154
15 RITG 0.11 0.03 3.60 <0.001 0.09 0.03 2.93 0.004 −0.55 0.294
16 RBGtp 0.12 0.03 3.87 <0.001 0.07 0.03 2.23 0.019 −1.25 0.113
17 RHIP 0.09 0.04 2.11 0.048 0.09 0.04 2.16 0.022 −0.11 0.457
18 RINS 0.13 0.05 2.63 0.008 0.13 0.05 2.66 0.007 −0.07 0.473
19 RHIP 0.11 0.03 3.75 <0.001 0.09 0.03 2.83 0.005 −0.68 0.253
20 RIFG 0.10 0.03 2.78 0.006 0.05 0.04 1.44 0.083 −1.33 0.099
TID
21 LMPFG −0.03 0.05 −0.64 0.266 −0.13 0.05 0.27 0.008 −1.83 0.041
22 LSPG −0.04 0.02 −1.57 0.066 −0.07 0.02 0.07 0.004 −2.32 0.016
23 LCALC −0.11 0.03 −3.20 0.002 −0.14 0.03 0.00 <0.001 −1.07 0.149
24 LCALC −0.14 0.07 −2.05 0.027 −0.19 0.07 0.03 0.006 −1.62 0.061
25 LAG −0.05 0.04 −1.28 0.108 −0.09 0.04 0.11 0.030 −0.92 0.184
26 LSTG −0.04 0.04 −1.08 0.146 −0.15 0.04 0.15 <0.001 −2.69 0.007
27 LROLop −0.04 0.03 −1.24 0.115 −0.09 0.03 0.11 0.004 −1.43 0.085
28 RCUN −0.13 0.06 −2.30 0.016 −0.16 0.05 0.02 0.002 −0.98 0.170
29 RCALC −0.09 0.08 −1.14 0.135 −0.22 0.08 0.13 0.007 −2.90 0.004
30 RAG −0.07 0.02 −4.22 <0.001 −0.10 0.02 0.00 <0.001 −0.94 0.178
31 RAG 0.01 0.04 0.33 0.372 −0.01 0.04 0.37 0.382 −0.79 0.220

Individual ROI reults for contrasts CueD–baseline, CueE–baseline as well as CueD–CueE. Statistical results for CueD–baseline and CueE–baseline are only intended for illustrative purpose, as ROIs are selected based on these two contrasts. Abbreviations: ROI, region of interest; abb, abbreviation; TIA, task induced activation network; TID, task induced deactivation network; for ROI names see Table 1. 1This significant contrast does not survive Bonferroni correction, which is set at: 0.0025.