Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 20;92(1100):20190067. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20190067

Table 3.

Statistics of the DVH metrics differences between the DCG -, FCN- and GAN-based sCT and CT

PTV
Dmin D10 D50 D95 Dmean Dmax
DCG Mean (Gy) 0.160 0.081 0.088 0.081 0.083 0.161
SD (Gy) 0.227 0.049 0.058 0.059 0.055 0.123
FCN Mean (Gy) 0.158 0.138 0.125 0.130 0.131 0.260
SD (Gy) 0.171 0.121 0.134 0.102 0.124 0.247
GAN Mean (Gy) 0.062 0.197 0.171 0.160 0.177 0.336
SD (Gy) 0.055 0.239 0.258 0.146 0.231 0.211
p-value (DCG vs FCN) 0.020 0.358 0.491 0.272 0.422 0.170
p-value (DCG vs GAN) 0.083 0.878 0.977 0.693 0.933 0.334
p-value (FCN vs GAN) 0.745 0.588 0.555 0.686 0.587 0.793
Liver
D min D 10 D 50 D 95 D mean D max
DCG Mean (Gy) 0.002 0.063 0.027 0.005 0.030 0.141
SD (Gy) 0.002 0.051 0.031 0.013 0.025 0.106
FCN Mean (Gy) 0.001 0.073 0.027 0.003 0.023 0.257
SD (Gy) 0.001 0.060 0.035 0.005 0.028 0.248
GAN Mean (Gy) 0.002 0.094 0.047 0.005 0.037 0.284
SD (Gy) 0.002 0.144 0.075 0.008 0.068 0.230
p-value (DCG vs FCN) 0.771 0.376 0.815 0.720 0.686 0.102
p-value (DCG vs GAN) 0.915 0.976 0.506 0.552 0.683 0.378
p-value (FCN vs GAN) 0.415 0.218 0.331 0.355 0.206 0.439

DCG, dense-cycle-GAN; FCN, fully convolutional neural network; GAN, generative adversarial network; PTV, planning target volume; SD, standard deviation.

Mean,SD and p-value are based on the absolute difference.