Skip to main content
. 2005 Sep 28;25(39):8867–8877. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2541-05.2005

Table 1.

Differences among the three CF neurons with regard to the membrane potential and properties of Ih




High CF

Middle CF

Low CF
Resting membrane potentials (mV)a
    Controlb -63.0 ± 0.5 (9) -62.2 ± 0.5 (29) -61.6 ± 0.7 (31)
    ZD7288 (0.1 mm) -63.4 ± 0.6 (9) -64.7 ± 0.9 (12)* -64.8 ± 0.6 (23)*
Properties of Ihc
    Maximum current amplitudes (nA)d
        Instantaneous -0.7 ± 0.1 (15) -1.8 ± 0.1 (26) -4.6 ± 0.7 (8)
        Steady-state -2.7 ± 0.2 (15) -5.2 ± 0.2 (26) -11.7 ± 1.6 (8)
    Activation kinetics (ms)e
        τfastf 52.2 ± 3.2 (13) 31.4 ± 1.4 (26) 29.9 ± 3.9 (9)
        τslowf 313.3 ± 39.3 (13) 162.8 ± 13.0 (26) 142.7 ± 16.5 (8)
    Vh (mV)f -95.5 ± 0.6 (15) -85.8 ± 0.5 (26) -85.8 ± 2.8 (8)
    S (mV)b
9.8 ± 0.3 (15)
10.1 ± 0.3 (26)
9.3 ± 0.3 (8)

Numbers in parentheses are the numbers of cells.

*

Statistically significant difference (p < 0.05 by unpaired t test) compared with the control in each CF.

a

Data are from current-clamp experiments (Figs. 3, 4).

b

Difference was not significant among the three CF neurons (p > 0.27).

c

Data are from voltage-clamp experiments (Fig. 5).

d

Current amplitude was measured at -143 mV step pulse (Fig. 5). Difference was significant among the three CF regions (p < 0.01).

e

Activation kinetics were measured at -123 mV step pulse (Fig. 5).

f

Difference was significant between high CF neurons and neurons in the other two regions (p < 0.01) but was not significant between middle CF and low CF neurons (p > 0.1).