Table 1.
Variables | TD, n = 44a Mean ± SEM |
ASD, n = 17b Mean ± SEM |
t-Test, P-Value |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Agec (Mean) | 13.61 ± 0.49 | 11.98 ± 3.42 |
t59
= 1.69, P= 0.095 |
||
Age (Range) | 7.62 – 18.00 y | 6.56 – 16.48 y | --- | ||
Sex (M:F) | 22 M:22 F | 14M:3F | --- | ||
IQd | |||||
Composite | 104.43 ± 2.36 | 100.27 ± 7.35 |
t39
= 0.71, P = 0.48 |
||
Verbal | 102.10 ± 2.48 | 94.36 ± 7.53 |
t44 = 1.27, P = 0.21; |
||
Nonverbal | 105.10 ± 2.20 | 104.67 ± 5.58 |
t40
= 0.088, P=0.93 |
||
ADOSe | 17.82 ± 1.23 | --- | |||
Communication | --- | 4.91 ± 0.46 | --- | ||
Reciprocal social interaction | --- | 9.54 ± 0.68 | --- | ||
Imagination/creativity | --- | 1.00 ± 0.19 | --- | ||
Stereotyped behaviors and restricted interests | --- | 2.36 ±0.51 | --- | ||
ADI-Rf | |||||
Reciprocal social interaction | --- | 23.33 ± 1.86 | --- | ||
Communication | --- | 17.17 ± 1.81 | --- | ||
Restricted, repetitive, and stereotyped patterns of behavior | --- | 7.50 ± 0.67 | --- | ||
SRSg | Total SRS score | 27.93 ± 3.30 | 120.92 ± 7.62 |
t40
= −11.40, p = 3.84 × 10−14 |
|
Social awareness | 6.00 ± 0.60 | 14.75 ± 1.29 |
t40 = −7.01, p = 1.82 × 10−8 |
||
Social cognition | 5.77 ± 0.80 | 24.42 ± 1.32 |
t40
= −12.33, p = 3.30 × 10−155 |
||
Social communication | 10.1 ± 1.60 | 41.17 ± 3.36 |
t40
= −9.42, p = 1.05 × 10−11 |
||
Social motivation | 6.40 ± 0.81 | 17.92 ± 1.35 |
t4o
= −7.46, p = 4.39 × 10−9 |
||
Autistic mannerisms | 3.63 ± 0.68 | 22.67 ± 1.44 |
t46= −13.52, p = 1.67 × 10−16 |
All tests are thresholded at p < 0.05 (t-test, two-tailed)
There are 44 total unique TD subjects: 28 subjects included full experiment analyses (Figures 2 and 3, Supplemental Figure 1); 16 in matched single stimulus ROI analysis (Figure 4); and all 44 for non-matched comparison (Supplemental Figure 2).
There are 17 total unique ASD subjects: 12 subjects included full experiment analyses (Figures 2 and 3); and, 16 in matched single stimulus ROI analysis (Figure 4). One participant was excluded, please see methods for details.
No significant difference between ages of two groups
Assessed using Kaufmann Brief Intelligence Test, Second Edition; no significant difference between IQ scores of each group; n = 11/17 (12 for non-verbal) ASD, n = 30/44 TD
Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule; n = 11/17 ASD, 1 subject assessed using Module (Mod) 1, 1 using Module 2, 7 using Module 3, 2 using Module 4; ADOS scores were not available for 3 ASD subjects diagnosed with ADOS.
Autism Diagnostic Interview – Revised; n = 6/17 ASD
Social Responsiveness Scale (raw-scores); Total SRS score and subscale scores are significantly higher in ASD children compared to TD; n = 12/17 ASD, n = 30/44 TD