Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 12;40(2):211–226. doi: 10.1007/s10974-019-09538-6

Table 1.

Protein binding identified at the Myod proximal regulatory region (PRR), distal regulatory region (DRR), core enhancer (CE) and adjacent regions

Region Interacting protein Binding shown by Binding sitea References
PRR MSC ChIP-qPCR in mouse embryo branchial arch tissue Not characterised Moncaut et al. (2012)
TCF21 ChIP-qPCR in mouse embryo branchial arch tissue Not characterised. Moncaut et al. (2012)
RAD21 ChIP-qPCR in Rhabdomyosarcoma cells Not characterised Taberlay et al. (2011)
p300 ChIP-qPCR in C2C12 cells Not characterised Hamed et al. (2013)
MYOD ChIP-seq in C2C12 cells and primary myoblasts Not characterised Mousavi et al. (2013) and Umansky et al. (2015)
MYF5 ChIP-seq in mouse embryonic fibroblasts transduced with MYF5 Not characterised Conerly et al. (2016)
PITX2 ChIP-PCR in C2C12 cells and extraocular eye muscle cell line Not characterised Zacharias et al. (2011)
DELTEX2 ChIP-qPCR in C2C12 cells Not characterised Luo et al. (2017)
Inter PRR–DRR PITX2 ChIP-qPCR in hindlimb buds and myotome. EMSA with in vitro translated PITX2 PITX2 binding site at − 615 bp L’Honore et al. (2010)
MYOD EMSA with nuclear extracts from hindlimb muscle, G8 myoblasts and C3H/lOT1/2 fibroblasts Two E boxes at − 1750 and − 865 bp Zingg et al. (1994)
GLI2 ChIP-pPCR in P19 cells GLI consensus binding sites at − 1.6 kb and − 0.6 kb Voronova et al. (2013)
FOXO3 ChIP-PCR antibody in C2C12 cells. EMSA with recombinant FOXO3 Two Forkhead Regulatory Elements at − 940 bp and − 1598 bp Hu et al. (2008)
PAX3/7 ChIP-PCR in C2C12 cells. EMSA with recombinant PAX3 and PAX7 Paired binding site at − 1502 bp Hu et al. (2008)
CHOP ChIP-PCR with C2C12 cells Not characterised. Primers bind at − 3 kb and − 4 kb Alter and Bengal (2011)
DRR SIX1/4 ChIP-seq and -qPCR in C2C12 cells and satellite cell derived myoblasts. EMSA with in vitro translated SIX1 and SIX4 MEF3 site in DRR Le Grand et al. (2012), Liu et al. (2010) and Relaix et al. (2013)
EYA1/2 ChIP-qPCR in mouse embryo trunk muscle precursor cells Not characterised, likely to be via SIX binding at MEF3 site Relaix et al. (2013)
PITX2 ChIP-qPCR in mouse embryo myotome Not characterised L’Honore et al. (2010)
MSC ChIP-qPCR in mouse embryo branchial arch tissue Not characterised Moncaut et al. (2012)
TCF21 ChIP-qPCR in mouse embryo branchial arch tissue Not characterised Moncaut et al. (2012)
SRF ChIP-qPCR in C2C12 cells. EMSA with nuclear extracts from C2.7 cells Divergent CaRG box (a hybrid SRF/MEF2 binding site) L’Honore et al. (2003) and L’Honore et al. (2007)
MEF2 ChIP-qPCR in C2C12 cells.. EMSA with nuclear extracts from C2C12 cells Divergent CaRG box (a hybrid SRF/MEF2 binding site), and a canonical MEF2 binding site L’Honore et al. (2007) and Mokalled et al. (2012)
YY1 EMSA with nuclear extracts from C2.7 cells Divergent CaRG box (a hybrid SRF/MEF2 binding site) L’Honore et al. (2003)
MRTF-A ChIP-qPCR in C2C12 cells Divergent CaRG box (a hybrid SRF/MEF2 binding site) Mokalled et al. (2012)
MASTR ChIP-qPCR in C2C12 cells Divergent CaRG box (a hybrid SRF/MEF2 binding site), and a canonical MEF2 binding site Mokalled et al. (2012)
C/EBP EMSA with nuclear extracts from C2.7 cells Divergent CaRG box (a hybrid SRF/MEF2 binding site) L’Honore et al. (2003)
p300 EMSA with nuclear extracts from C2.7 cells. ChIP-qPCR in C2C12 cells Divergent CaRG box (a hybrid SRF/MEF2 binding site) L’Honore et al. (2003) and Hamed et al. (2013)
MYOD ChIP-seq in C2C12 cells and primary myoblasts. Not characterised Mousavi et al. (2013) and Umansky et al. (2015)
MYF5 ChIP-seq in mouse embryonic fibroblasts transduced with MYF5 Not characterised Conerly et al. (2016)
DELTEX2 ChIP-qPCR in C2C12 cells. Not characterised Luo et al. (2017)
Inter DRR–CE MYOD ChIP-seq in C2C12 cells and primary myoblasts Not characterised. Chip-seq peaks map to region around − 10.5 kb and − 12 kb Conerly et al. (2016), Cui et al. (2017) and Umansky et al. (2015)
MYF5 ChIP-seq in mouse embryonic fibroblasts transduced with MYF5 Not characterised. Chip-seq peaks map to region around − 10.5 kb Conerly et al. (2016)
CE SIX1/4 ChIP -seq and -qPCR in C2C12 cells. EMSA with in vitro translated SIX1 and SIX4 Two MEF3 sites Liu et al. (2010) and Relaix et al. (2013)
EYA1/2 ChIP-qPCR in mouse embryo trunk muscle precursor cells Not characterised, likely to be via SIX binding at MEF3 site Relaix et al. (2013)
PITX2 ChIP-qPCR in hindlimb buds and myotome. EMSA with in vitro translated PITX2 Two PITX2 binding sites L’Honore et al. (2010)
RAD21 ChIP-qPCR in Rhabdomyosarcoma cells Not characterised Taberlay et al. (2011)
LSD1 ChIP-qPCR antibody in C2C12 cells Not characterised Scionti et al. (2017)
CLOCK ChIP-PCR in muscles from mice kept in a 12 h light–dark cycle. EMSA with extract from C2C12 cells overexpressing CLOCK and BMAL Divergent E-box (CAGCTT) Andrews et al. (2010) and Zhang et al. (2012)
BMAL2 ChIP-PCR in muscles from mice kept in a 12 h light–dark cycle. EMSA with extract from C2C12 cells overexpressing CLOCK and BMAL Divergent E-box (CAGCTT) Andrews et al. (2010) and Zhang et al. (2012)
MYOD ChIP-seq in mouse embryonic fibroblasts transduced with Myod, in C2C12 cells, and primary myoblasts Not characterised Conerly et al. (2016), Cui et al. (2017), Mousavi et al. (2013) and Umansky et al. (2015)
MYF5 ChIP-seq with in mouse embryonic fibroblasts transduced with MYF5 Not characterised Conerly et al. (2016)
YB1 ChIP-PCR and -qPCR in C2C12 cells expressing Not characterised Lee et al. (2004) and Song and Lee (2010)
MSX1 ChIP-PCR in C2C12 cells and mouse embryo limbs Not characterised Lee et al. (2004), Song and Lee (2010) and Wang et al. (2011)
SIM2 ChIP-PCR in mouse embryo limb buds Not characterised Havis et al. (2012)
Upstream of CE GLI2 ChIP-pPCR in P19 cells overexpressing GLI2 GLI consensus binding sites at − 32 kb and − 36 kb Voronova et al. (2013)
PAX7 Chromatin Tandem Affinity Purification (ChTAP) in satellite cell-derived myoblasts Not characterised. Chip-seq peaks map to region around − 40 kb Soleimani et al. (2012b)

aCharacterized binding sites are those sites where physical binding and/or function had been validated via EMSA and/or luciferase assays, including mutation of the binding site. For some ChIP-seq studies binding was determined through analysis of files downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (Conerly et al. 2016; GEO accession: GSE75370; Cui et al. 2017; GEO accession: GSE63716; Umansky et al. 2015, GEO accession: GSE56131)